Mistakes about the identity of a party to the contract
What are the mistakes about the identity of a party to the contract?
Expert
For contracts not bargain in person, if party whose identity was mistaken assumed the name of some person or business known to the retailer, case in Cundy v. Lindsay, agreement would be void.
Consequently, if the purchaser has since sold the goods to 3rd party, duped seller would be able to recover the goods from that third party as if the goods were stolen rather than purchased in good faith. On the other hand, if the party whose identity was mistaken assumes the name of someone completely non-existent, as was the case in King's Norton, the contract would be voidable since the court holds there is no one else with whom the seller could have intended to contract.
Write short note on “The Constitution”?
What are the seven essential criteria for negotiable instruments?
Explain the causation as a Requirement for Liability under Tort Law?
Illustrate federal Competition Act?
Explain the other Contracts with Minors?
What is the common law position, in provinces without a Frustrated Contracts Act?
Explain what do you mean by Mineral Leases and Profit Prendre?
What do you mean by General Partnerships?
Illustrate courts may grant relief while mistake?
Explain the change in Ownership and its control?
18,76,764
1944123 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1434200
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!