--%>

Iterative System Solvers, Power Methods

Iterative System Solvers, Power Methods, and the Inverse Power Method for Boundary

Value Problems.

1. Code and test Jacobi and Gauss-Sidel solvers for arbitrary diagonally dominant linear systems.

2. Compare performance/results with tridiagonal Gaussian elimination solver for the problem arising from

-y’’=f on (0,1) with y(0)=0=y(1). You may also want to use sparse storage and MATLAB’s built in ’\’ operator

as a third solver.

3. Code and test a power method with deflation program to find all (approximate) eigenvalues/eigenvectors of

an arbitrary symmetric nxn matrix.

For full points you must use your Gauss-Sidel solver, but most credit can be acheived via use of the built in ’\’

operator. This applies to the next problem as well.

4. Code and test an inverse power method with deflation program to find the first few eigenvalues and eigenfunctions

(eigenvectors) of -y’’ = l y on (0,1) with y(0)=0=y(1).

****************************************************************************

5. To shorten the project, this item is an Extra/Optional/Final Project idea.

Code and test an inverse power method with deflation program to find the first few eigenvalues and eigenfunctions

(eigenvectors) of - D u = l u on W = H0, 1L

2 with u=0 on ¶W .

You will need a function that solves - D u = f on W = H0, 1L

2 with u=0 on ¶W T. est this with

f(x,y)=2p2 sin(p x)sin(p y )E. ither use a Gauss-Sidel solver you code, or use sparse storage for the block tridiagonal

matrix together with the ’\’ operator.

6. Another Extra/Optional/Final Project Idea: Repeat problem 5 on an irregular subregion of H0, 1L

2.

7. Another Extra/Optional/Final Project Idea: Write a Gaussian elimination solver for the block tridiagonal

system coming from - D u = f on W = H0, 1L

2 with u=0 on ¶W a,nalogous to your existing tridiagonal solver.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Sinking Fund problem Berks Corporation

    Berks Corporation is expecting to have EBIT next year of $12 million, with a standard deviation of $6 million. Berks have $30 million in bonds with coupon of 10%, selling at par, which are being retired at the rate of $2 million annually. Berks also have 100,000 share

  • Q : Which data is the most suitable for

    Which data is the most suitable for finding betas?

  • Q : Why required return cannot computed by

    Why can we not compute the required return (Ke) by the Gordon-Shapiro model [P0 = Div0 (1+g) / (Ke – g)] in place of using the CAPM? As we identify the current dividend (Div0) and the current share price (P0), we can acquire the growth rate of the dividend by th

  • Q : Problem on Zero coupon bonds

    Robertsons, Inc. is planning to enlarge its specialty stores into 5 other states and finance the expansion by issuing 15-year zero coupon bonds with a face value of $1,000. When your opportunity cost is 8 % and similar coupon-bearing bonds will recompense semi-annuall

  • Q : Investors are irrational or naive

    Explain how companies with substandard financial history can draw the attention of investors. Are investors irrational or naive?

  • Q : Problems under Time Value of Money One

    One of the projects the US loan would fund is to build earthquake-resistant buildings. The projectwill begin in March 2013, last for two years and is expected to have the following expenditures:start-up costs of $200,000 paid at the beginning of the first month; renta

  • Q : What is the required rate of return on

    Woidtke Manufacturing's stock currently sells for $29 a share. The stock just paid a dividend of $2.50 a share (i.e., D0 = $2.50), and the dividend is expected to grow forever at a constant rate of 9% a year. What st

  • Q : Explain the model of Heath Explain the

    Explain the model of Heath, Jarrow and Morton regarding tree building or Monte Carlo simulation.

  • Q : Explain the definition of WACC An

    An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we

  • Q : Problem on leveraged beta AB

    AB Restaurants has debt/equity ratio .25, and its leveraged beta is 1.5. Its tax rate is 30%, and its cost of equity is 15%. The risk-free rate is 5%. CD Restaurants has debt/equity ratio .4, and tax rate 35%. Find the cost of equity for CD.