--%>

Explain Factorisation by trial division

Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in turn by the primes 2, 3, 5,..., going possibly as far as [√n], we will either encounter a prime factor of n or otherwise be able to infer that n is prime. Repeating this process as often as necessary we will be able to nd all the prime
factors of n.

We can re fine this idea a little. If we fi nd on division by the prime p that p is a factor of n, then we can recommence trial divisions, but now dividing into the integer n/p rather than n. Also, the divisions can start with the prime p rather than restarting with 2, since we know that n, and hence n/p, has no prime factors smaller than p.

Further, we now need only carry out trial divisions by primes up to [√n/p]. Similarly for later steps.

An obvious difficulty with trial division is that we need either to store or to generate the primes up to [√n], and it may be better simply to divide by all the integers from 2 up to [√n], or, for example, by 2 and then all the odd numbers up to [√n].

Other improvements are possible too, but even with a few improvements the trial division algorithm is inefficient , and the algorithm is unsuitable for all but fairly small initial values of n.

Despite this, the trial division algorithm is in practical use. It is often used as a preliminary phase in a factorisation algorithm to nd the `small' prime factors of a number, and the remaining unfactorised part, containing all the `large' prime factors, is left to later phases.

Most numbers have some small prime factors. For example, it is not hard to show that about 88% of positive integers have a prime factor less than 100 and that about 91% have a prime factor less than 1000, and trial division will be good at finding these factors.

On the other hand, most numbers also have large prime factors. It can be shown (though not so easily) that a random positive integer n has a prime factor greater than √n with probability ln 2, or about 69% of the time, and of course if n is large, then trial division will not be of any help in nding such a factor.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : How to get calculus homework done from

    How to get calculus homework done from tutor

  • Q : Formulating linear program of an oil

    An oil company blends two input streams of crude oil products alkylate and catalytic cracked to meet demand for weekly contracts for regular (12,000 barrels) mind grade ( 7,500) and premium ( 4,500 barrels) gasoline’s . each week they can purchase up to 15, 000

  • Q : Who independently developed

    Who independently developed a model for simply pricing risky assets?

  • Q : Graph Theory is the n-Dimensional Qn

    is the n-Dimensional Qn Hamiltonian? Prove tour answer

  • Q : Problem on reduced row-echelon The

    The augmented matrix from a system of linear equations has the following reduced row-echelon form. 280_row echelon method.jpg

  • Q : Row-echelon matrix Determine into which

    Determine into which of the following 3 kinds (A), (B) and (C) the matrices (a) to (e) beneath can be categorized:       Type (A): The matrix is in both reduced row-echelon form and row-echelon form. Type (B): The matrix

  • Q : Problem on Nash equilibrium In a

    In a project, employee and boss are working altogether. The employee can be sincere or insincere, and the Boss can either reward or penalize. The employee gets no benefit for being sincere but gets utility for being insincere (30), for getting rewarded (10) and for be

  • Q : Properties of a group How can we say

    How can we say that the pair (G, o) is a group. Explain the properties which proof it.

  • Q : Problem on mixed-strategy equilibrium

    Assume three Offices (A, B, & C) in downtown,  simultaneously decide whether to situate in a new Building. The payoff matrix is illustrated below. What is (are) the pure stratgy Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) and mixed-strtegy equilibrium of the game?

  • Q : Define Well-formed formulas or Wffs

    Wffs (Well-formed formulas): These are defined inductively by the following clauses:    (i) If  P  is an n-ary predicate and  t1, …, tn are terms, then P(t1, …, t