Example of Normative Economics with no value judgments

A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majority of voters. (z) None of the above.

Can someone suggest me the answer of the above question? Please choose one option from the above choices.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Wealth of nation according to Adam Smith

    Adam Smith asserted that a wealth of nation is not gold, although is as an alternative the: (w) wisdom of its government. (x) goods and resources its people control. (y) new physical territory this conquers. (z) military power this co

  • Q : With whom is Economists LEAST concerned

    Economists are LEAST related along with the: (w) gains and losses from changes in government policies. (x) adjustments people make when tax structures change. (y) causes of inflation and unemployment. (z) ethics of political campaigning.

  • Q : Determine the positive technical

    Which of the given is a positive technical statement? (i) The Miss America contest is sexist and tasteless. (ii) The moon is made of green cheese. (iii) Microsoft’s record of innovation justifies Bill Gates’ incredible wealth. (iv) Capitalism improves peop

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

  • Q : Problem on private property rights and

    I have a problem in economics on private property rights and laissez faire. Please help me in the following question. The basics of pure capitalism comprise: (i) Social ownership of all non-human resources. (ii) Strong two party electoral system. (iii

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Issues of normative economic policy

    Economic policy matters are usually: (w) simply resolved by positive analysis alone. (x) normative, but workable solutions based on positive analysis. (y) either strictly macroeconomic, or strictly microeconomic. (z) better resolved using common sense

  • Q : Determine the opportunity cost while

    While people buy something, then its opportunity cost is the: (w) monetary price they paid. (x) enjoyment they get by their purchase. (y) satisfaction they lost by not buying something else. (z) time they should work to pay their bills.

    Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.