--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Causes of an increment in the price of

    Please help me to solve the problem of price that is given below: A raise within the price of bread would: (i) Reasons more wheat to utilize to bake bread. (ii) Encourage more people to eat bread. (iii) Discourage

    		•
  • Q : Determine the opportunity cost while

    While people buy something, then its opportunity cost is the: (w) monetary price they paid. (x) enjoyment they get by their purchase. (y) satisfaction they lost by not buying something else. (z) time they should work to pay their bills.

    Q : Savings as big investment The Economic

    The Economic growth in a proficient economy will tend to increase when: (1) Capital quickly depreciates and becomes obsolete. (2) Threats of war divert resources to the national defense. (3) People’s savings increase to permit bigger investment. (4) Funds for re

    		•
  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

    		•
  • Q : Example of wasted water in inefficiency

    Why do people usually assume that water run on sidewalks and within the street while they water their lawns? Is that wasted water a symbol of inefficiency?

    		•
  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

    		•
  • Q : Illustrate an example of Efficiency in

    Bobby Joe Bob owns a hog feed factory within Los Angeles, CA. Oddly adequate, there is not a large market for hog feed within L.A. Bobby Joe Bob moves his operation to a minute, backwards town termed as The Sticks, NC, where a huge market for hog feed awaits him. That

    		•
  • Q : Closest to a Free Good in economic What

    What would be the closest to a "free good" in economic terms: (i) Local telephone directory assistance, (ii) Air conditioning thrown in when you buy a new car, (iii) Drinking water and (iv) Breathable air of the current atmospheric quality?

  • Q : Explained economics capital generally

    Where is generally economic capital referred: (1) Money and other financial assets. (2) Machinery, buildings and equipment. (3) Net investment minus depreciation. (4) Corporate bonds and stocks. Can anybody suggest

    		•
  • Q : Self-interested behaviour in economics

    Several critics of our economic system contend such that self-interested behavior is not intrinsic, although that people are taught to be "selfish" through our society's stress within competition. Such critics argue that when we encouraged cooperation as much as we cu

    		•