--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Growth and Development-Production

    The production possibilities curve might be shifted outward by: (1) Decreasing unemployment. (2) Reducing the labor force. (3) Limiting the output of capital goods. (4) Raising the amounts or productivity of the resources.

    Q : Perceptions about equity and need

    Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s

  • Q : Existence of shortages or surpluses

    Shortages or surpluses exist while: (w) transaction costs are zero. (x) quantity supplied be different from quantity demanded. (y) monopolists enjoy exorbitant profits. (z) supply prices equivalent demand prices. H

  • Q : Divisions of labor in production

    Economic efficiency tends to be improved via: (1) Divisions of labor in specialization and production and trade according to comparative advantage. (2) Maximization of the opportunity costs. (3) Understanding macro-economics. (4) Intensive investments

  • Q : When is a good taken as scarce Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require

  • Q : With whom is Economists LEAST concerned

    Economists are LEAST related along with the: (w) gains and losses from changes in government policies. (x) adjustments people make when tax structures change. (y) causes of inflation and unemployment. (z) ethics of political campaigning.

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Problem regarding costs of buying

    Please recommend me your best answer for given problem. While buying a $70 shirt at Banana Republic maintains you from enjoying the pleasure of a $70 meal at a huge restaurant: (i) Opportunity costs are at play. (ii) You are not be

  • Q : How to recognize economics as a field

    recognize economics as a field of economics

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe