--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Associates facts in Economics of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Scientific Economic work that is given below: Scientific tries to relate facts to produce understanding of how things work are termed as: (w) mathematics. (x) theories or mode

  • Q : Where is all economic resources fall

    Can anybody advise me the explanation for specified problem regarding where is all the economic resources fall within the categories: (i) Infinite, free, energy, or knowledge. (ii) land, labor, capital, or entrepreneurship. (iii) consumption, saving,

  • Q : Explain about the capital goods Capital

    Capital goods are: (w) machines, equipment, buildings, and other enhancements to natural resources. (x) goods which indirectly contribute to human satisfaction. (y) resources which have been changed for use in the production of other goods. (z) All of

  • Q : Explain economics as the study of

    Economics is generally explained as the study of how societies and individuals: (1) make options about work and the division of labor, (2) try to maximize their financial wealth and incomes, (3) answer the fundamental economic questions of "Why, Where, and When", (4)

  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

  • Q : Scaring people of a commodity or service

    Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for given problem that when are people of a commodity or service scarce: (1) gain from having this obtainable, (2) Wish more than the amount freely obtainable, (3) Say no to p

  • Q : Explains economic problem posed for

    The chorus of a Rolling Stones' song begins along with a line that is, "You can't always acquire what you wish for," that broadly explains the economic problem posed by which factor: (v) scarcity, (w) opportunity costs (x) human greed (y) diminishing returns and (z) marginal utility? How

  • Q : Problem on equivalent amounts of goods

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the equivalent share criterion of distribution, individuals must: (i) Share income according to personal requirement. (ii) All produce equivalent shares of output. (iii) Each cons

  • Q : Determine the opportunity cost while

    While people buy something, then its opportunity cost is the: (w) monetary price they paid. (x) enjoyment they get by their purchase. (y) satisfaction they lost by not buying something else. (z) time they should work to pay their bills.

    Q : Allocative mechanisms of Economic

    Economic systems (example: capitalism versus socialism) are mainly distinguished by their relative reliance on alternative allocative mechanisms, and particularly by: (1) Who builds major economic decisions and who owns non-human resources. (ii) The level of inequalit