--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrate when firm shuts down

    When a firm shuts down within the short run,: w) its loss equals zero. x) its loss equals its fixed cost. y) is creates zero economic profit. z) its total revenue is not huge adequate to cover its fixed cost. How c

  • Q : Requirement of technically efficient

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that for production to be technically efficient needs that the: (i) Maximum benefits are acquired at the highest possible cost. (ii) Opportunity costs of production

  • Q : Illustrate the argue by David Hume

    Argument by David Hume that: (w) money is a “veil” which hides the actual workings of the economic system. (x) Corn Laws prevented English workers through competition through low-wage foreign workers. (y) capitalism is the system mainly co

  • Q : Defining the term Money in Economic I

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that how is defining Money a form of: (i) basic economic resource. (ii) the capital stock., (iii) financial capital. and (iv) precious metal.

    Q : Most dealing of normative economic

    Normative economic statements deal mainly along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) production possibilities frontier analysis. (y) facts in place of theories. (z) how to measure economic variables. Please choo

  • Q : Why are Land Land, labor, and capital

    Land, labor, and capital are all scarce since: (w) human wants are restricted. (x) less is obtainable than people want. (y) each productive resource needs a monetary return for its use. (z) once employed they cannot be used again.

    Q : Define the normative economics in

    Hello guys I want your opinion. Please suggest your answer for following Normative-economics problem. Normative economics: (i) based upon value judgments. (ii) involves statements which are either right or wrong. (

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns The idea

    The idea that costs ultimately grow faster than output if output is expanded obeys logically from the law of: (i) Increasing expectations. (ii) Raising returns to scale. (iii) Diminishing returns. (iv) Demand and supply. (v) Rational effects.

    Q : Problem on Laissez-faire The movement

    The movement towards laissez-faire policies would best be described by a strategy to: (1) Stimulate the domestic production by raising import tariffs. (2) Remove laws to subsidize farming. (3) Guarantee food stamps for fundamental survival. (4) Functi