--%>

Economist-Conclusion for redistribution of wealth and income

I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) society gains since the poor require the income more than the rich. (x) it is socially bad since somebody lost. (y) society gains since more people were helped than were made worse off. (z) assessing the consequence on social welfare needs a value judgment.

Please guys help me to solve this query.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Decision making and outputs as well as

    Particular decision making and how outputs and prices are determined are the mainly focus of: (w) Occam’s razor (x) microeconomic analysis. (y) macroeconomic theory. (z) economic efficiency Hey friends please give your opinio

  • Q : Dealing of technical efficiency in

    Technical efficiency deals along with problems of: (w) Maximizing the value of production. (x) Curing inequity. (y) Concentrating wealth more totally. (z) Redistribution from rich to poor. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanat

  • Q : Requirement of goods for economic

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic efficiency. Please suggest me your suggestion that the need for economic efficiency which society should produce the goods people want is termed as: (i) allocative inefficiency. (ii) productive inefficiency. (iii) distribu

  • Q : Problem of Economic Policies and

    Hello guys I want your opinion. Please recommend your view for given Economic Policies and Normative Economics problems. Disagreements in between economists about economic policies most commonly occur from differences within their:

  • Q : Define positive technical statement on

    A positive technical statement on the subject of college life is which: (1) college deans are more moral than department chairs. (2) elite colleges frequently admit the wrong students. (3) history professors and accounting professors deserve similar pay. (4) on averag

  • Q : Does the entire thing have a price in

    Does the entire thing have a price? Are there several things you would not perform regardless of price? (Keep in mind that prices and money is not synonyms; here prices may be nonmonetary.)

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Associates facts in Economics of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Scientific Economic work that is given below: Scientific tries to relate facts to produce understanding of how things work are termed as: (w) mathematics. (x) theories or mode

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor