When is a thing termed as a good as opposite to a bad

A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.

How can I solve my economics problem of Bads? Please suggest me the answer for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Incentives to create and to use goods

    Please help me to solve the problem of prices which is given below: Information regarding incentives to create and to use goods efficiently is imbedded most directly within: (i) Relative prices. (ii) Normative econ

  • Q : Economic assumption of rationality in

    As per to the economic assumption of rationality: (w) entrepreneurs are usually more rational than employees. (x) consumers often perform in random or erratic ways. (y) people tend to behave in accord along with their goals. (z) people who are rationa

  • Q : Limitation of resource category of

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the economists’ resource category of “land” would not contain: (1) coal, petroleum, and other minerals. (2) the fish and water within the oce

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Describe an illustration of Positive

    Predicting a fall within the national unemployment rate along with a new untested economic model is an illustration of: (1) positive economic analysis. (2) normative economic analysis. (3) a microeconomic prediction. (4) predictability no better than a call to the psy

  • Q : Government as a trustee on nonhuman

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Government acts as the trustee over nonhuman resources beneath: (i) Laissez-faire capitalism. (ii) Socialism. (iii) Fee-simple property rights systems. (iv) Feu

  • Q : Which aspect cannot given by Prices in

    Prices can’t give which one following aspect: (i) Incentives for efficient resource utilize. (ii) Guides for changing levels of production. (iii) Information regarding relative costs. (iv) Ideal references to cover all opportunity costs.

  • Q : Building and capital tools production

    Buildings and capital tools can't produce anything without labor, showing such that labor is: (i) a productive resource. (ii) the merely productive resource. (iii) exploited through capitalists. (iv) the key to technology. (v) a provider of entreprene

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.