--%>

Define subjective opportunity cost for the Mercedes

Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost...

If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe worthless, that you then trade for a diamond ring even if you dislike jewellery, and subsequently you swap the ring for a Picasso you believe is ugly, that you exchange for the Mercedes which was your only goal within all such deals, your subjective opportunity cost for the Mercedes was your satisfaction or say enjoyment of the: (1) Picasso painting. (2) Diamond ring. (3) Shares of mining stock. (4) Race horse. (5) Audi.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Wealthy entrepreneurs by perfectly

    Do you agree along with the adage such that "You cannot find rich working for somebody else"? Should successful entrepreneurs serve others to enrich themselves? Can wage earners acquire great wealth without investing? How may you test the accuracy of your answ

  • Q : Crime punishment suggest by Jeremy

    Suggestion of Jeremy Bentham that crime must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of intent, remorse or motive.” His proposal would result within more than the optimal amount of crime due to the:

  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

  • Q : Primary comprehensive work in economics

    The primary comprehensive work upon economics within English was written via Adam Smith (1776 year) and entitled. An Inquiry within the Nature and Causes of: (1) Laws of Supply and Demand. (2) Wealth of Nations. (3) Movements of Prices in Competition. (4) Incomes of D

  • Q : Property Rights I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Property Rights. Please help me in getting the right answer from the following question. John Locke believed that the value and property rights derive from: (i) Social conventions prevailing inheritance. (ii) The helpf

  • Q : Argument for infant industries to

    The argument for infant industries must be protected through competition through established foreign industries was first advanced through: (1) Richard List. (2) Gustav Schmoller. (3) David Ricardo. (4) Alexander Hamilton. (5) Thomas Robert Malthus. (6) early mercanti

  • Q : Value of the best foregone alternative

    The value of the best foregone alternative explains: (w) opportunity costs. (x) monetary costs. (y) irrational behavior through a consumer. (z) retail price margins over production costs. How can I solve my above e

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : When is normative economics crucial Can

    Can anybody suggest me the appropriate explanation for given problem regarding normative economics generally. Normative economics is critical while an economist tries to: (i) predict how OPEC's refuse will influenc

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated