The definition of family has changed considerably over the years. Your question for debate is:
Question 1: Who should be covered under these highly regulated benefits? Should the definition of family be altered or deleted when structuring benefit plans?
Question 2: Much of the rationale is directed at the unfair bias in benefits for traditional families versus non-traditional families. With a divorce rate hovering at 50 percent and the number of single households adopting children, as well as the debate over recognizing partnerships, the issues are gaining more attention. A recent article cited some 1400-plus legal benefits and protections of being in a civil marriage.
Question 3: Does that constitute an unfair bias? Should the law change? What is your opinion on this issue? Cite and reference a source of support for your opinion.