Discuss fpa techniques


Discuss the project

Give a report on the topic described below in essay format, with a 1,500 words (excluding references, tables and diagrams). Please show your word count. You are expected to research the concepts described and review literature on the topic. Include a minimum of five (5) references from scholarly journals or texts. Use examples to illustrate your understanding of the issues and provide some conclusion from your research. Topic In 1976, Alan Albrecht published results of research into the relative efficiency of different software development approaches. This became the basis of Function Point Analysis (FPA) which was to be shown as the most accurate and consistent schedule estimating and performance management technique within the software development industry. You are required to research FPA to determine its characteristics and why it works well in an industry that was otherwise regarded as unreliable for its scheduling and performance measurement. It is not expected that you understand the techniques of software development. It is expected that you analyse the key characteristics of the industry and determine why the management of software development projects has been regarded as inherently unreliable. Also report on what FPA is and what it contributed to management of projects in this industry and why it was different (and more successful) than other estimating and performance management techniques that were being used in this environment. Provide your response under the headings of:

FPA - definition and history

Problems with estimating in the software development environment

What FPA techniques provide that was previously lacking

Your opinion of the value of FPA ; Project Time Management

The remaining marks  are for the layout, referencing and presentation of your assignment.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Information Sys: Discuss fpa techniques
Reference No:- TGS01774900

Now Priced at $30 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)