--%>

Problem regarding to intermediation for ticket scalping

Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? See when you can devise graphs to clarify this form of speculation.

E

Expert

Verified

The production of any type of good or service, with avoidance of queuing, involves costs. Without compensation, any scalper will not give this service. Events’ promoters who wish to ignore scalping could simply increase prices till they were assured surpluses of tickets and seats. Promoters do not do this since they are not harmed by scalping and do not actually want to remove scalping. When scalping was eliminated, this would decrease demands for tickets for events which unexpectedly failed to draw adequate crowds to fill the seats. Following figure demonstrates the market for scalping and tickets.

1932_intermediation for ticket scalping.png

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : State normal good Normal good : It is a

    Normal good: It is a good for which, other things equivalent, a rise in income leads to a rise in demand.

  • Q : Output and price comparison with

    Compared to the output and price which are allocatively efficient by the vantage point of society, in that case a monopolist tends to: (w) produce less and charge a higher price. (x) maximize average profits when possible. (y) set price in the inelast

  • Q : Profit from predatory pricing In order

    In order for a firm to profit from predatory pricing: (w) the incumbent must fulfill the entire industry demand at a price below costs. (x) the cost of predation should be less than the profits incurred through driving out one’s rivals from the

  • Q : Demand in Dynamics The raise in the

    The raise in the supply of potatoes is probable to decrease the: (i) Supply of potato harvesters. (ii) Demand for pasta and rice. (iii) Price of Big Macs. (iv) Quantity of ketchup people put on hot-dogs. (e) Budgets of most house-holds.

  • Q : Consequences of the price floor

    Consequences of the price floor: The consequences of price floor might be: (A) Surplus of the commodity (B) The government might resort to buffer stocks to absorb the excess in the market at the support price and sells the products to consumers beneat

  • Q : Problem regarding to tax wedges in

    In equilibrium, a tax upon a good tends to because of the: (1) supply to exceed the demand. (2) quantity supplied to exceed the quantity demanded. (3) demand prices of consumers to exceed the supply prices of sellers. (4) competitive

  • Q : Change in response in determinants of

    In short run, the demand for mink coats is least probable to change in response to: (i) Development of the petroleum based faux fur fabric which can’t be differentiated from genuine mink except via DNA analysis. (ii) Armies of a

  • Q : Problem regarding to Subsidy Wedges The

    The demand for an undergraduate college education would rise from the perspective of college administrators when: (w) the federal government started paying half of the interest charged upon student loans. (x) grade inflation was reversed and the average grade earned b

  • Q : Illustrate an example of relative price

    Joy waits into a long line at her local bookstore therefore she can be between the first to buy and read a newly-printed hardback copy of the newest Harry Potter adventure. And Lindsay waits till a lower priced paperback edition is printed just before buying any Potte

  • Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income