--%>

Problem regarding to intermediation for ticket scalping

Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? See when you can devise graphs to clarify this form of speculation.

E

Expert

Verified

The production of any type of good or service, with avoidance of queuing, involves costs. Without compensation, any scalper will not give this service. Events’ promoters who wish to ignore scalping could simply increase prices till they were assured surpluses of tickets and seats. Promoters do not do this since they are not harmed by scalping and do not actually want to remove scalping. When scalping was eliminated, this would decrease demands for tickets for events which unexpectedly failed to draw adequate crowds to fill the seats. Following figure demonstrates the market for scalping and tickets.

1932_intermediation for ticket scalping.png

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Managerial Economics-Error of omission

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The ‘error of omission’ takes place when: (1) Managers pursue policies which outcome in layoffs. (2) Corporations vend more stock than is really available. (3) Manage

  • Q : Yellow dog contracts-collective

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more communally and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Black-listing in its dealing

  • Q : Reduction in demand of Complementary

    Mold that damaged the hamburger crop following a flood would be most probable to decrease the demands for: (i) fried chicken with gravy and mashed potatoes. (ii) Soda pop and bottled water. (iii) Carrots, cucumbers and egg plant. (iv) Ketchup and mustard. (v) Sushi an

  • Q : Selling footballers-the economic

    State economic arguments on whether a football club must sell a significant player?

  • Q : Average total costs above the demand

    A profit-maximizing monopolist will necessarily incur economic losses when, at every feasible level of output as: (w) average fixed costs [AFC] are very high. (x) average total costs [ATC] lies above the demand curve. (y) average tota

  • Q : Question on supply-and-demand diagrams

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Increase profits of quantity selling by

    When a monopolist was selling a quantity which marginal revenue [MR] is greater than marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] in that case this could increase profits by: (w) raising price. (x) increasing output. (y) raisi

  • Q : Formation of a cartel This would be

    This would be easiest to form a cartel between: (w) retail grocers. (x) aluminum producers. (y) dairy farmers. (z) domestic marijuana producers. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regar

  • Q : Minimizes losses and maximizes profits

    When Firm B in demonstrated graph successfully minimizes losses and maximizes its profits that have: (1) covered overhead while incurring short-run economic losses. (2) potential economic profit of Pbgh per period. (3) total costs equal to 0phq2. (4)

  • Q : Structure conduct performance paradigm

    From about 1890 till 1970 year, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories regarding how firms behave in various types of markets. The term here “performance” in this context refers to those things as: (i)