--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Problem regarding to intermediation for ticket scalping

Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? See when you can devise graphs to clarify this form of speculation.

E

Expert

Verified

The production of any type of good or service, with avoidance of queuing, involves costs. Without compensation, any scalper will not give this service. Events’ promoters who wish to ignore scalping could simply increase prices till they were assured surpluses of tickets and seats. Promoters do not do this since they are not harmed by scalping and do not actually want to remove scalping. When scalping was eliminated, this would decrease demands for tickets for events which unexpectedly failed to draw adequate crowds to fill the seats. Following figure demonstrates the market for scalping and tickets.

1932_intermediation for ticket scalping.png

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

    		•
  • Q : Cumulative Effect What do you mean by

    What do you mean by the term Cumulative Effect?

    		•
  • Q : Uy what is basic objects of bretton

    what is basic objects of bretton woods?

    		•
  • Q : Define Economics Briefly describe the

    Briefly describe the term economics?

    		•
  • Q : Effects of deceptive accounting

    Whenever stockholders who made big financial investments in Enron prior to the mid-1990s suffered huge losses during the year 2001-2002 since of deceptive accounting practices and insider trading, they were the victims of problem termed as: (1) Adverse selection (2) M

    		•
  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Problem based on GDP Assume nominal GDP

    Assume nominal GDP in the year of 2002 was $100 billion and in the year of 2003 it was $260 billion. The general price index in 2002 was 100 and in 2003 it was 180. Between 2002 and 2003 the real GDP rose by: A) 160 percent. B) 44 percent. C) 37 percent. D) 1

    		•
  • Q : Surviving firms in declining

    When firms exit a declining competitive industry, in that case surviving firms will: (i) reduce their outputs and prices. (ii) experience higher prices and profits. (iii) automate to adjust to lower wages. (iv) sell more output at lower prices. <

    		•
  • Q : Demand prices exceeds supply prices

    When only Q0 papayas reached the market in that case: (1) desperate buyers would be willing to pay only P1 per papaya. (2) production costs would exceed P2 per papaya. (3) buyers would be indifferent regarding getting additional papaya

    		•
  • Q : Why are buyers and sellers forced to be

    Several buyers and sellers are forced to be price-takers since: (w) vigorous competition maintains individuals from noticeably influencing the market. (x) only monopoly firms adjust quantities. (y) markets adjust slowly. (z) quantity adjustment is not

    		•