Explain Conspiracies of a Competition Act
Explain Conspiracies of a Competition Act?
Expert
The Act prohibits cartels (called trusts in the U.S., hence the expression “anti-trust law”) and any conspiracy by two more persons to unduly lessen competition. To determine whether an agreement has seriously reduced competition, the courts must first determine the relevant market in terms of product and geographic area and then decide whether the accused parties had a large enough market share to injure the competition.
Because it is difficult to prove that there was an agreement to lessen competition, the existence of such an agreement is often inferred from tactics used. Methods of reducing or eliminating competition include parallel pricing (adopting similar pricing strategies), setting quotas (limiting production), market sharing (agreeing to divide up the market by territory), and product specialization (agreeing to each make/sell different products).
Another specific prohibited offence is bid rigging, where an agreement is made not to submit a bid, or an agreement is made in advance regarding what bids will be submitted in response to a call for bids or tenders.
What do you mean by Tender of Payment?
How breach of contract depends on Essential and Non-Essential Terms?
Illustrate Contract and the term Corporation?
What are the Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule?
Illustrate the term Patents?
Explain what do you mean by Self-Induced Impossibility?
Illustrate the capacity of a contract?
Explain the Insurance policy?
Illustrate federal Competition Act?
Distinguish between a major breach and a minor breach?
18,76,764
1927242 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1437616
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!