--%>

Elucidate Ticket Scalping - A Bum Rap

Elucidate “Ticket Scalping:  A Bum Rap”?

E

Expert

Verified

1. “Scalping” refers to the practice of reselling tickets in higher rates as compared to the original rates, which happens often with athletic and artistic events.  Is this “ripping off” justified?

2. Ticket re-sales are voluntary—both buyer and seller must feel that they gain or they would not agree to the transaction.

3. “Scalping” market simply redistributes assets (tickets) from those who value them less than money to those who value them more than the money they’re willing to pay.

4. Sponsors may be injured, but in that case they ought to have raised the prices of tickets higher.

5. Spectators are not damaged, according to economic theory, because those who want to go the most are getting the tickets.

6. Both seller and buyer benefit and event sponsors are the only ones due to which their own error in pricing may lose and they would have lost from this error whether or not the scalping took place.

 

 

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Economic efficiency enhancement as

    Transaction costs are decreased and economic efficiency is enhanced by: (1) long-term wage and price controls. (2) monopolies which cooperate with central planners. (3) blacklists and yellow dog contracts. (4) bureaucratic tendencies

  • Q : Importance of Price Earnings Ratio

    Write down the importance of Price Earnings Ratio?

  • Q : Recycling center Suppose you go to a

    Suppose you go to a recycling center and are paid 25 cents per pound for your aluminum cans.  However, the recycler charges you $.20 per bundle to accept your old newspapers.

  • Q : Problem on prisoners dilemma game Lets

    Lets assume an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game by two players. The resulting payoffs at each phase by the actions of two players are illustrated below in the table (payoffs are symbolized like (payoff for player 1, payoff for player 2)). Two players

  • Q : Technological advances in producing

    When given resources can now produce additional goods than was previously probable, then there have been a: (1) Stock market boom. (2) Competitive spurt which shrinks entrepreneurial gain. (3) Concavity reversal in the production possibilities frontier. (4) Bigger rel

  • Q : Describe Spillovers and externalities

    Describe Spillovers and externalities?

  • Q : Loathed monopolization and viewed of

    Adam Smith and most of the typical economists who followed instantly in his footsteps: (i) viewed monopoly as no big problem. (ii) encouraged monopolies due to their research and development abilities. (iii) thought monopoly power was a communist plot

  • Q : Why Public or social goods not be

    Why Public or social goods not be produced through the market?

  • Q : Local expenditures and receipts for all

    Elucidate the Local expenditures and receipts for all local governmental units in 1996?

  • Q : Heterodox cost theory Is Eiteman &

    Is Eiteman & Guthrie’s empirical evidence on the shape of the average total cost curve consistent along with heterodox cost theory?  Discuss it out.