--%>

Would inflation targeting be a good policy

Question:

Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%. Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Explain the term Macroeconomics

    Macroeconomics is a study of: (1) the economy as an entire or in the aggregate. (2) worldwide economic problems of individual households. (3) interactions among firms and households in one exact market or industry. (4) the rising income inequality wit

  • Q : National disposable income What must be

    What must be added to NNPMP to obtain net national disposable income? Answer: The Net current transfers from abroad must be added to NNPMP to get national disposabl

  • Q : Problem on equivalent Consumer Surplus

    Tom reimburses $5.00 for a ticket to see a present hit movie. If Tom was willing to reimburse up to $7.00 for that ticket, his consumer surplus equals: (1) $5.00 (2) $2.00 (3) $7.00 (4) Tom does not receive any consumer surplus as he purchased the ticket.

  • Q : Economic Economic systems differ

    Economic systems differ according to which two main characteristics?

  • Q : Creation of assets or reduction of

    Illustrate which budget expenses does not result in the creation of assets or reduction of liability. Give illustrations too.

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium when current

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When Brussels sprouts cost $1 per pound and tofu is $2 per pound and your marginal utilities (additional jollies) from either an additional pound of tofu or an additional pound

  • Q : Macro economics policy (a) Do you think

    (a) Do you think that macroeconomic policy should be designed to achieve a measured unemployment rate of zero? Why or why not should this be the case?

  • Q : Aggregate Expenditure model Describe

    Describe Aggregate Expenditure model and also state AD/AS model?

  • Q : Subjective worth of Consumer Surplus

    The consumer gains from being capable to purchase at a single price rather than paying all that the particular quantity of the good is subjectively worth are: (i) Adverse selections. (ii) Market exploitation. (iii) Consumer surpluses. (iv) Moral hazards.

  • Q : For every value of real GDP planned

    planned investment. planned saving. the difference between planned saving and actual saving. the difference between planned investment and actual saving.