--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Would inflation targeting be a good policy

Question:

Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%. Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Fox I don't know how to make him stop

    I don't know how to make him stop dancing

    		•
  • Q : Money-just another good ‘What occurs in

    ‘What occurs in the money market when there is a raise in income?’

    		•
  • Q : Decisions at the Margin The least

    The least apparent illustration of how decisions are generally ‘at the margin’ would be: (i) Purchasing an additional novel after learning that all paper-backs at Borders are on sale for 25 percent off. (ii) Tossing a 6-year old cousin to the deep end of t

    		•
  • Q : Why value of multiplier is low In poor

    In poor countries people spend a big percentage of their income so that APC and MPC are high. Yet, the value of multiplier is low. Explain why?

    		•
  • Q : Fiscal deficits What are the causes of

    What are the causes of the fiscal deficits experienced by many developed nations in the past three years and what are the main effects of the resulting government borrowing? For example – Greece/Ireland/Portugal/Spain situation and the large def

    		•
  • Q : Paradox of Value-High values of

    The fact that most of the necessities for life like water are priced much lower than the frivolities like diamonds is addressed by the: (1) Utilitarian enigma. (2) Law of diminishing marginal utility. (3) Rational ignorance of hypothesis. (4) Paradox of the value. (5)

    		•
  • Q : What points out revenue deficit What

    What points out revenue deficit? Answer: Revenue deficits are stated as the surplus of revenue receipts. Revenue Deficit = Revenue Expenditure - Revenue Recei

    		•
  • Q : Are government budget scarcities always

    ‘The country is at present in recession and this has led to worse tax revenue and high expenses. The effect is a huge deficit. The government decides to increase taxes and lower government expenses. Is this an excellent idea?’

    		•
  • Q : The failure of the Supercommittee

    Question: Some commentators have argued that the failure of the "Supercommittee" is good thing for the economy?  Do you argree? Answer:

    Q : Paradox of Value-total utility and

    I have a problem in economics on Paradox of Value-total utility and marginal utility. Please help me in the following question. Water is more precious than diamonds when measured by _____, however less valuable when measured by _____. (i) Total cost, total benefit. (i

    		•