Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What is the reason that financial managers calculate the marginal tax rate?
What is a Poisson Process?
In May 1995, Japan Life Insurance Company invested $10,000,000 in pure-discount U.S. bonds while the exchange rate was 80 yen per dollar. The company liquidated the investment one year afterwards for $10,650,000. The exchange rate turned out 110 yen per dollar
Differentiate in brief a defined benefit and a defined contribution pension plan.
Who explained the credit instruments explosion?
venture capital valuation method a venture capitalist wants to estimate the value of a new venture. the venture is not expected to produce net income or earnings until the end of year 5 when the net income is estimated at 1,600,000.00. A publicly traded competitor or comparable firm has current ea
What is implied volatility? Answer: Implied volatility is number into the Black–Scholes formula which makes a theoretical price equal a market price.
You need to price an option that is paid for within instalments, and you can stop paying and lose the option. Which numerical method should you use?
Illustrates the family members of the GARCH?
Elaborate: Accounts receivable are sometimes not collected. What is the reason that companies extend trade credit when they could insist on cash for all sales?
18,76,764
1956232 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1422403
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!