Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What is a Coherent Risk Measure?
Why do you think the empirical studies regarding factors affecting equity returns mainly showed which domestic factors were more significant than international factors, and, secondly, that industrial membership of firm was of little importance in forecasting t
Explain in brief the accumulated depreciation?
What is Arbitrage Pricing Theory?
what are the factors resposible for the recent surge in international portfolio investment?
Illustrates an example relates with risk that defined in mathematical terms.
Who proposed the concept of market efficiency?
How is absolute risk aversion function defined?
Categorize the issues of Knight.
What are the levels of implied volatility? Answer: Implied volatility levels the playing field so you can compare and contrast option prices across strikes and expir
18,76,764
1937370 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1460723
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!