--%>

What is the opportunity cost of your decision

Suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $100 for an item, but learn that a store two miles away is charging $50 for it.  Would you drive there and buy it?  How does your decision benefit you?  What is the opportunity cost of your decision?  Now suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $6000 for an item, but learn that it costs $5950 at the other store.  Do you make the same decision as before? Perhaps surprisingly, you should!  Explain why.

E

Expert

Verified

Driving to the other store to save $50 does involve some cost in terms of time and inconvenience.  However, for most of us the time it takes to drive two miles would be worth $50.  For example, if it takes about ten minutes extra time and a negligible amount of gasoline (unless your time is worth $300 an hour, or $50 per each ten-minute period), it would benefit you to drive to the other store.  While in the second case, $50 may seem like less compared to the $6000 total price, for you the $50 is still a $50 savings, exactly the same as in the first case.  Therefore, you should apply the same reasoning.  Is the $50 benefit from driving the extra two miles worth the cost?  The conclusion should be the same in both cases.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Divergences arise between equilibrium

    What divergences arise between equilibrium and an efficient output when spillover costs? How might government correct this divergence?

  • Q : Utility with food coupons Question: In

    Question: In Vancouver the Salvation Army encourages people to make food voucher donations to panhandlers instead of simply giving them cash. You can buy a food voucher for $5 and give it to a panhandler who can use it to purchase food. The Sa

  • Q : What is the opportunity cost of your

    Suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $100 for an item, but learn that a store two miles away is charging $50 for it.  Would you drive there and buy it?  How does your decision benefit you?  What is the opportunity cost of your decision?  Now suppose you arrive at a s

  • Q : Who define Theory of Moral Sentiments

    The argument which slicing off one’s pinkie would be extra bothersome to which person than the loss of millions of his brethren was made within A Theory of Moral Sentiments (1755) through: (1) Adam Smith. (2) David Ricardo. (3) Theophrastus Phil

  • Q : Why do governments enact trade barriers

    Why do governments enact trade barriers?

  • Q : Illustrate Market Equilibrium of Supply

    Illustrate Market Equilibrium of Supply and Demand?

  • Q : Explain Self-interest of the Market

    Explain Self-interest of the Market System?

  • Q : What do you mean by Linkages What do

    What do you mean by Linkages?

  • Q : Laissez-faire philosophy of government

    As per to the laissez-faire philosophy of government,: (1) economy works best while all investment decisions are centralized. (2) market system works best along with only minimal government intervention. (3) government must be restricted to stabilizin

  • Q : High-convexity portfolios outperform

    a) Whether the bond market moves up or down, high-convexity portfolios will for all time outperform low-convexity portfolios of equal duration and yield." Elucidate the argument supporting this statement and the connection to the classical immunization strategy. What