Small market capitalization
Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?
Expert
January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.
Assume that a monopolist faces a demand curve that is higher at several output levels than is the firm’s average variable cost curve. Therefore the firm will generate where MR is equal to MC to maximize: (w) total revenue. (x) consumer surplus.
When a price hike for Big Gulps of GlugaChug from $1 to $2 improves sales of dehydrated water from 50 to 100 kegs, then the dehydrated water and GlugaChug are: (1) Joint outputs in the production. (2) Complements. (3) Substitutes. (4) Mixed resource alternatives.
You are provided a bond which will pay no interest however will return the par value of $1,000 20 years from now. When your needed return for this bond is 7.35%, what are you willing to reimburse or pay?
Assume that a new Wal-Mart is built just outside a small town, and also Wal-Mart aggressively cuts prices therefore much that the rivals close their doors. In that case, once its rivals exit the market, the Wal-Mart raises prices significantly. Wal-Ma
Why, according to Keynes, is investment the key economic variable? Why does he think that the volatility of investment spending is likely to cause a problem of aggregate effective demand? Why does he think that this problem can only be solved by government interventio
Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in the resource market however which has the market power in output market will hire labor at a point where: (1) VMP =
A soft drink bottler which finds it cost efficient and gainful to deliver the chips and other snack foods all along with cola would be experiencing: (i) Economies of scope. (ii) Positive psychic income. (iii) Economies of scale. (iv) Economies of structure. (v) Diseco
The faddish popularity of Atkins and the South Beach diets both of which advice dieters to eat additional meat and to decrease the intake of starchy carbohydrates, probably decreased incomes most sharply for: (1) cattle ranchers. (2) Grocery store clerks. (3) Sushi ch
A purely competitive firm will turn out where P = MC since this: (w) is good for society. (x) is all which is permitted through law. (y) maximizes profits. (z) permits price adjustment although not quantity adjustment. Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil
A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil
18,76,764
1922631 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1440399
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!