--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit at

    Within the long run, after HoloIMAGine’s holographic technology patents lapsed moreover entry and exit became probable in this market, therefore HoloIMAGine would be expected to: (w) carry on to reap economic profits. (x) break even and experien

  • Q : Infinity elasticity of demand within

    When price changes for fresh peaches don’t modify total revenue to peach farmers, then the price elasticity of demand for peaches: (w) constant beside a linear demand curve. (x) infinity (the demand curve is horizontal). (y) uni

  • Q : When is not total annual revenue

    As per this demonstrated figure in below, unless something changes the total annual revenue of Robot Butlers, Inc. Can’t exceed: (1) $10,000. (2) $20,000. (3) $100 million. (4) $200 million. (5) $400 million.

  • Q : Large numbers of potential sellers in

    Features of pure competition do not comprise: (w) homogeneous products.(x large numbers of potential buyers. (y) important barriers to entry. (z) large numbers of potential sellers. Can anybody suggest me the prope

  • Q : International demand or supply affected

    Sixty Chinese manufacturers have started producing generic staplers. Since each factory is very small to noticeably influence the international demand or supply for staplers, every firm is: (1) a cartelized seller. (2) a price taker. (3) a primary goo

  • Q : Problem relating to Taxes and Subsidies

    I have a problem in economics on Problem relating to Taxes and Subsidies. Please help me in the following question. The sales taxes and government subsidies: (1) Influence only demand. (2) Do not influence the supply curve. (3) Affect the supply curve

  • Q : Relatively price inelasticity of demand

    When cuts into the price of cowboy hats drive down total revenues to hat makers, in that case demand: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) infinitely price elastic. (5) zero pr

  • Q : Isoquants and isocost lines By using

    By using isoquants and isocost lines, illustrates graphically that rise in y will result in a decline in the quantity demanded of x1 and also illustrates that rise in the price of x1 will result in a reduction in the quantity demanded of x1<

  • Q : Charging price in short run for profit

    Now Roast chicken dinners replace fried chicken in popularity in this given demonstrated figure. In the short run that profit maximizing firm will charge a price equal to: (w) $12.00. (x) $11.00. (y) $10.00. (y) $9.00. (z) $6.50.

    Q : Annual total costs of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit into its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there annual total costs of it will be around: (1) $180 million. (2) $140 million. (3) $100 million. (4) $80 million. (5) $40 mil