--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Consequence of foreign exchange rate

    What are consequence of foreign exchange rate risk and how do this risk be mitigated?

  • Q : Present value of given interest rate An

    An interest rate of 10 percent causes the present value of $1000 acquired one year by now to be: (w) $1000. (x) $1,100. (y) $909.09. (z) $100. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economi

  • Q : Problem on price elasticity The firm’s

    The firm’s net revenue grows whenever the price of a good is cut when the price elasticity of: (i) Demand surpass the price elasticity of supply. (ii) Replacement goods are less than one. (iii) Supply is in an associatively elastic range. (iv) D

  • Q : Definition of Economic Profit To assert

    To assert that a firm made exactly zero economic profits as well signifies that it made: (i) Zero accounting profits. (ii) Normal economic profits. (iii) Negative accounting profits. (iv) No profits at all. Choose the right answer

  • Q : Price discriminate A monopolist selling

    A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky

  • Q : Problem on Monopsonistic exploitation I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Monopsonistic exploitation of labor signifies that the: (i) Influenced workers receive much low wages. (ii) Firm reaps big economic gains by exploiting the worke

  • Q : Computations of price elasticity of

    The price elasticity of demand in given figure below for DVD games among prices of $30 and $40 is roughly: (w) 3/7. (x) 7/3. (y) 1/21. (z) 21.

    Q : Transformation of Predictable Income

    The transformation of predictable income streams within wealth is termed as: (i) monetization. (ii) financial arbitrage. (iii) capitalization. (iv) seignorage. (v) capital accumulation. How can I solve my E

  • Q : Negative marginal utility The economic

    The economic good becomes an economic bad whenever consumption is expanded into an area where: (1) Sellers experience the moral hazard.  (2) Marginal returns are diminishing. (3) Marginal utility is negative. (4) Buyers suffer from adverse choice. (5) Extreme cho

  • Q : Case of heroin in public policies When

    When heroin were legalized in that case: (w) its price would fall and fewer addicts would connect in crime to support their habits. (x) the attractiveness of becoming a supplier would increase. (y) more people might experiment along with the drug since the price is re