--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Private demands and supplies to assign

    Reliance on private demands and supplies to assign goods and resources is least certain to outcome an economically ineffective solution just because: (i) Producers encompass monopoly power. (ii) A good is non-rival and non-exclusive. (iii) Consumption

  • Q : Why are buyers and sellers forced to be

    Several buyers and sellers are forced to be price-takers since: (w) vigorous competition maintains individuals from noticeably influencing the market. (x) only monopoly firms adjust quantities. (y) markets adjust slowly. (z) quantity adjustment is not

  • Q : Simple circular flow model The simple

    The simple circular flow model illustrates that: A) households are on the buying side of both product and resource markets. B) businesses are on the selling side of both product and resource markets. C) households are on the selling side of the resource market and on

  • Q : Price floors with government purchases

    Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus

  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

  • Q : Screening and Credentialism The critics

    The critics of ‘credentialism’ suppose that firms making employment decisions tend to mainly rely too heavily on: (i) Personal contacts. (ii) Personality testing. (iii) Past experience. (iv) Job interviews. (v) Formal education and trainin

  • Q : Differences in site values An acre of

    An acre of Manhattan is worth additional than an acre of prime Iowa farm land due to differences in: (1) perpetuities. (2) time preferences. (3) site values. (4) interest rates. (5) taxes. Can someone explain/help me with best solu

  • Q : Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in price

  • Q : Tacit collusion by oligopolists Tacit

    Tacit collusion through oligopolists is possible when: (w) agreed to by the government. (x) a price leader is visible. (y) the oligopolists succeed in forming a cartel. (z) very few firms control the market. How ca

  • Q : Profit-maximizing monopolists I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Profit-maximizing monopolists. Please help me in the following question. Profit-maximizing monopolists exploit the labor since: (i) Workers are paid very less than the value of their average physical products. (ii) The