--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for the serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, a person who wishes to maximize the utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (1) The similar amo

  • Q : Ceiling price problem When the

    When the government obliged a ceiling price of P0 on papayas, the market scarcity would correspond to line: (1) ab. (2) cd. (3) ac. (4) bd. (5) ae. </span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Income tax rates and government

    When line 0C0' in this figure shows the current Lorenz curve for the U.S. distribution of income after taxes and transfers, the probably short run outcomes of 10 percent cuts into both income tax rates and government transfer

  • Q : Increasing demand for Complementary

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When tortilla chips go on sale for fifty percent off, then the demand for salsa is most probable to: (1) Stay similar. (2) Reduce. (3) Raise. (d) Raise only when salsa as well g

  • Q : Absolute value of demand slope Since

    Since the price drop/falls and quantity demanded rises all along this demand curve for pizza, the absolute value of slope will be: (1) Is constant and elasticity falls. (2) Elasticity are constant. (3) Drop/falls and elasticity is constant. (4) Elasti

  • Q : Elasticity of demand changes with price

    Calculating the price elasticity of demand for DVD games for a price variation from $50 to zero in such demand curve is: (w) 0. (x) infinity. (y) mostly meaningless since elasticity changes continuously over such range. (z) 1.5.

    Q : Consumption of goods changes as income

    This below figure demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C and D changes as a family’s income changes. When income increases, the income elasticity of demand is positive although declining for: (w) good A. (x) good B 

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Absolute value for price elasticity of

    The price elasticity of demand for Robot Butlers includes the greatest absolute value at an exact price of: (i) $20,000. (ii) $16,000. (iii) $12,000. (iv) $8,000. (v) $4,000.

    Q : Production at exceeds marginal costs by

    For any profit-maximizing monopolist not capable to price discriminate, production arises at an output level where is: (w) price exceeds marginal costs [P > MC]. (x) marginal revenue exceeds marginal costs [MR >