Small market capitalization
Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?
Expert
January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.
When animal rights activists persuade several fur coat buyers to switch to micro-fiber jackets as well as pelt prices decrease from $150 to $50 each, resultant in the baby seal harvest decreasing from 18,000 to 6,000 yearly, in that case the price elasticity
When a monopolist increases output along with elastic demand, then total revenue: (w) increases at a constant rate. (x) increases at an increasing rate. (y) increases at a diminishing rate. (z) All of the above are possible.
Pure competitors in a long-run equilibrium are paid a price which: (i) allows recovery of any previous operating losses. (ii) equals MC although exceeds average cost. (iii) maximizes average revenue minus average cost. (iv) equals maximum long run ave
The price elasticity of supply in given grph is infinite therefore supply is perfectly price elastic within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D. Q : Dollar revenues and accounting costs Can someone please help me in finding out the most accurate answer from the following question? The Accounting profit is the difference among: (1) Dollar revenues and accounting costs. (2) Net revenue and economic cost. (3) Accounting cost and economic cost. (4) Psych
Can someone please help me in finding out the most accurate answer from the following question? The Accounting profit is the difference among: (1) Dollar revenues and accounting costs. (2) Net revenue and economic cost. (3) Accounting cost and economic cost. (4) Psych
Paradise Planners sold deluxe Hawaiian winter vacation’s 170 packages at a price of $1900, although only 130 tourists signed up while the price increased to $2100. Such Hawaiian vacations have a price elasticity of demand approximately equal to:
Price floor: Price floor refers to the lowest amount price fixed by the government over the market determined price and hence the producers of the necessary items such as wheat, rice and so on might not experience losses.
Unlike the competitive employers, profit-maximizing firms with the monopsony power will: (1) Set any salary they want and hire as lots of workers as they want. (2) Make any amount and charge any price they desire for output. (3) Be expected to try to make the most of
Transfer payments and progressive tax policies are being determinate to: (w) reduce disparities in the distributions of income and wealth. (x) shift the Lorenz curve toward a position of less income equality. (y) have no net effect on income equality
An emphasis onto socioeconomic mobility based upon equality of opportunity, independently of inheritances of land or else physical capital, which is a centerpiece of a system of distribution termed as: (1) meritocracy. (2) laissez faire capitalism. (3
18,76,764
1940199 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1420731
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!