Profit maximization and maximization of shareholder
Give the difference between corporate profit maximization and maximization of shareholder wealth?
Expert
Profit maximization relates to profits *only* while shareholder capital also involves total company equity, debt ratios and many of 15 other financial performance measure ratios. Management could concentrate on profit maximization over a longer period of time, like 40 years (Toyota), whereas the shareholder would see stock values and corporate total value increase instantly (get in and get out) (90% of American manufacturers). As management focused on short-term profit maximization, like the expense of long-term sales revenues, then shareholder wealth (stock price) could actually decrease because of the loss of market share.
Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The law of comparative benefit exhibits: (a) Why trade with a country in which salaries are low is not fair. (b) How countries try to use each other via trade. (c)
Taxes will be shifted forward completely when supply is positively sloped as well as the demand curve is, there contrary to economic reasoning: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) perfectly elastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) flatter than supply.
When the annual interest rate is 11 percent and a small office building can be expected to lease perpetually for price of $33,000 annually, the building and also the land it sits onto have a present value of approximately: (1) $363,00
Price discrimination implies: (1) charging different prices for identical goods that have identical production costs. (2) paying wages based on race or sex quite than productivity. (3) exploiting the working masses by charging the highest single price
Refer to the following diagram, which depictes demand and supply conditions in the competitive market for product X. A shift in the demand curve from D0 to D1 might be caused by a(n): 1) decrease in income if X is an inferior good. 2) increase in the price of compleme
The rise in the price of Pepsi will effect a: (1) Shift of the supply curve of Coke to left. (2) Shift of the supply curve of Pepsi to right. (3) Movement downwards all along the supply curve of Coke. (4) Movement up and to right all along the supply curve of Pepsi.
Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The provisions of Taft Hartley Act did not proscribe: (i) Secondary boycotts. (ii) Closed shops. (iii) Jurisdictional strikes. (iv) Right-to-work laws.
I have a problem in economics on Examples of pairs of complementary goods. Please help me in the following question. The illustrations of pairs of complementary goods would comprise: (1) Coffee and tea. (2) Butter and margarine. (3) Motor boats and wa
In this demonstrated figure, there the price elasticity of demand coefficient is: (1) one at the midpoint. (2) greater than one in range a. (3) less than one in range b. (4) falling along with movements down along the demand curve. (5) All of the abov
The knowledge regarding local trees and shrubs which Morgan learns as working as an apprentice landscaper in suburbs of a big city is an illustration of the advantages from: (i) Dirty work. (ii) Dues-paying. (iii) General training. (iv) High-skilled employment. (v) Sp
18,76,764
1949508 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1458651
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!