--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Minimum Wage Laws The

    The Minimum wage legislation is UNLIKELY to aid: (i) Skillful workers who compete with untrained workers. (ii) Untrained workers who don’t lose their jobs. (iii) Buyers of goods which are more capital intensive associative to the buyers of labor intensive goods.

  • Q : Estimate federal poverty rate The

    The federal poverty rate computed by the Bureau of the Census is the: (w) ratio of poverty income to the average income. (x) number of persons below the poverty line. (y) percentage of persons below the poverty line. (z) official defi

  • Q : Most efficient technology at the lowest

    When all goods are produced in highly competitive markets as well as there are no externalities, goods tend to be manufactured: (i) relatively inefficiently. (ii) along with the most efficient technology at the lowest price. (iii) along with maximum p

  • Q : Effects of less liquid assets on

    When households become more willing to hold less liquid assets, the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) present value of future income falls. (y) interest rate falls. (z) stock market will crash. How can I solve my

  • Q : Consuming a grouping of goods problem A

    A household utmost it’s utility by consuming a grouping of goods which exhausts income when, for each and every good, the: (i) Marginal utilities are equivalent. (ii) Prices are equivalent. (iii) Ratios of marginal utility or price are equivalen

  • Q : Marginal revenue product problem

    Siberian Software vends custom programs to the multinational corporations. Its programs are coded in a remote region. In equilibrium, the Siberian’s programmers produce a marginal revenue product equivalent to around: (i) $21 per hour. (ii) $25 per hour. (iii) $

  • Q : Substitution effect on supply curves

    One of the reasons for positive relationship among relative price and quantity supplied is the: (1) Technology effect, whereby bigger firms generate at lower average costs than the smaller firms. (2) Substitution effect, whereby firms switch among for

  • Q : Untrue of an oligopoly This is untrue

    This is untrue of an oligopoly which: (i) only a few firms dominate a market. (ii) entry barriers may be important. (iii) economic profit are possible in the long run. (iv) no close substitutes exist for the product of any firm. (v) market power is sh

  • Q : Find supply when slope of supply curve

    When the slope of a supply curve which goes through the basis equals one, supply is: (w) price elastic. (x) price inelastic. (y) unitarily price elastic. (z) indeterminate like to elasticity without more information.

    Q : Long-run economic losses in a

    Expectations of long-run economic losses within a competitive industry as: (1) inevitably follow “cut throat” pricing policies. (2) cause firms to leave the industry. (3) increase each firm’s long-run fixed costs. (4) create pressure