--%>

price discriminate

A monopolist selling several di erent products can sometimes "price discriminate" by bundling her products together. Here's an example. Suppose the U of C is planning to o er a series of two concerts. The rst program in the series consists of music by Chopin; the second, music by Stravinsky. There are four types of patrons with the following reservation prices (willingness to pay) for the concerts:

 Romantic Type: $40 for Chopin, $20 for Stravinsky  Modern Type $20 for Chopin $40 for Stravinsky

 Chopin Lover $45 for Chopin $5 for Stravinsky

 Stravinsky Lover $5 for Chopin $45 for Stravinsky

Suppose for simplicity that there is only one individual of each type and everyone can be accom-

modated at either performance. Also suppose the U of C does not know any individual's given

type.

(a) Suppose rst that separate tickets are o ered for the two concerts. What is the pro t

maximizing price per ticket?

(b) Suppose that only a single ticket for the series is o ered. What is the pro t maximizing

price for a series ticket? Have pro ts increased? What is the intuition for this result?

(c) Can you nd a more pro table alternative?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Hicks model of collective

    The model of collective bargaining designed by the John Hicks graphically resolves for the level of: (i) Wage rate and length of strike. (ii) Fringe advantages and safety cases on the job. (iii) Wage rates and union dues. (iv) Union control over the w

  • Q : Moral Hazard-Equilibrium wage If

    If workers know that they are guaranteed a particular weekly wage and can simply find another job at this equilibrium wage, then some workers tend to loaf or shirk. This is an illustration of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Moral hazard. (iii) Demand and supply. (iv) Ine

  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in

  • Q : Market in terms of economists To

    To economists, the noun ‘market’ signifies to: (1) The geographic place where many products are sold. (2) Any institution which enables sellers and buyers to strike bargains. (3) The New York Stock Exchange. (4) Selling goods and resources or stocks and bo

  • Q : Reduction of consumption of Inferior

    Brian, a poor college student, eats pinto beans or Ramen Noodles for dinner every night. After the graduation, he takes a job with a beginning salary of $50,000 per year. This modification in income is most probable to: (1) Decrease his consumption of both the product

  • Q : Price elasticity coefficient at

    Every point beside a vertical demand curve (when there was such a thing) would include a price elasticity coefficient equivalent to: (1) 1. (2)  1. (3) zero. (4) infinity. (5)  1/2. Hey friends please giv

  • Q : Affects of costs and revenues in

    When the relative positions of all affects on costs and revenues are the same for all the several firms in this industry, in that case this firm is most likely operating in a: (w) differentiated oligopoly market in the short run. (x) monopolistically

  • Q : Horizontal summation of individual

    The market demand curves for most of the goods are as: (i) Cross-multiplied products of the individual demand curves. (ii) Insignificant for most of the analytical aims. (iii) The horizontal summation of the individual demand curves. (iv) Irrelevant for business decis

  • Q : Definition of Consumer Surplus The

    The difference among the price a consumer would have been eager to pay for the commodity and the price consumer really has to pay is termed as: (i) Gain. (ii) The substitution effect. (iii) The income effect. (iv) Consumer surplus.

  • Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (