--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market power at output market The

    The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in the resource market however which consists of market power in the output market will hire the labor at a point where: (p) VMP = MRP = MFC = w. (q) VMP > MRP = MFC = w. (r) VMP = MRP = MFC > w. (s) VMP

  • Q : Explain the term GNI per capita How do

    How do you explain the term GNI per capita?

  • Q : Long run equilibrium price When

    When Christmas tree farming is a decreasing cost industry and this firm is typical, in that case an increase in the market demand for Christmas trees will give in a long run equilibrium price: (1) greater than P1. (2) less

  • Q : Emerge natural monopoly by economics of

    A monopoly might emerge naturally while economies of scale: (w) are small relative to market demand. (x) do not exist. (y) are large relative to market demand for output. (z) and average costs are rising over the market output range.

    Q : Determine profit per unit of output

    Price minus average total cost i.e., P - ATC equals: (w) total profit. (x) marginal cost. (y) marginal revenue. (z) profit per unit of output. Please choose the right answer from above...I want you

  • Q : Earn zero economic profit by

    When a monopolistic competitor is earning zero economic profit, in that case this: (1) sells at a price equal to average total cost. (2) sells at a price equal to marginal cost. (3) is at the minimum point on its average total cost cu

  • Q : Adverse Selection problem I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Adverse Selection problem. Please help me in the following question. When Sally Sleaze sells Terry Tonedeaf a low quality boom-box by advertising it as ‘top of the line’, there is a trouble of: (i) Irrational ignorance. (ii

  • Q : Relative Income Measures and

    After adjusting income for taxes and transfers, affects that would be least responsible for the reducing percentages of the U.S. population classified like “middle relative income” from 1976 is probably: (

  • Q : Welfare Programs and Incentives The

    The incentive to work and earn income is probable to be greatest when the basic welfare benefit is ____ and the fundamental welfare benefit is reduced by ____ which the person earns. (w) high, the amount (x) low, the

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand when price

    When diet faddists gulp 205 million unsweetened as “No-Carb” milkshakes of $2.30 apiece, if cut back to 155 million per week while the price rises to $3.70 every, the price elasticity of their demand for shakes equivalents