--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Horizontal sum of the quantities in

    The short-run supply curve for a purely competitive industry is the horizontal total of the: (a) quantities demanded by consumers at each price. (b) prices charged by individual firms for each quantity supplied. (c) quantities supplied by established

  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

  • Q : Profit maximizing strategy Prohibition

    Prohibition Corporation would exactly break-even on its St. Valentine’s Day software when, in place of correctly identifying its profit maximizing strategy, this: (1) operated at point i, charging just $20 per copy and producing

  • Q : Competitive theory of prices Normal 0

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Goods in positive price cross

    When two goods contain positive price cross elasticities of demand, then the two goods are: (1) inferior goods. (2) superior substitutes. (3) complementary goods: (4) gross substitute. (5) normal goods. I need a go

  • Q : Purely competitive or monopolies or

    Compared to either purely competitive firms or oligopolists, monopolies are: (w) more probable to consider the possible reactions of other firms. (x) oblivious to the actions of other firms. (y) less likely to engage

  • Q : Profit maximization at the rate of

    At the rate of output, profits are maximized where marginal: (i) revenue is maximized. (ii) revenue equals marginal cost. (iii) revenue exceeds marginal cost by the greatest amount. (iv) cost is minimized. Can some

  • Q : Find elastic demand when price and

    When the price of Kellogg's Corn Flakes goes up from $1.89 to $2.05 as well as quantity demanded changes from 250 to 210, in that case the demand for Kellogg's Corn Flakes: (w) unitary elastic. (x) relatively inelastic. (y) relatively

  • Q : Meaning of division of labor Give the

    Give the answer of following question. The division of labor means that: 1) labor markets are geographically segmented. 2) unskilled workers outnumber skilled workers. 3) workers specialize in various production tasks. 4) each worker performs a large number of tasks.<

  • Q : Net income under the negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this given figure, a family of four along with earned income of $75,000 per year would have a net as [after-tax] income of: (i) $15,000 per year. (ii) $30,000 per y