--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Enter an industry by barriers to entry

    Barriers to entry: (w) make this complicated or impossible for new firms to profitably enter an industry. (x) uniformly violate U.S. antitrust statutes. (y) are fundamentally technological instead of economic. (z) stimulate aggressive competition.

  • Q : Examples of adverse selection Which of

    Which of the given below statement is not an illustration of the adverse selection? (i) You agree on a price for utilized car; however the dealer did not tell you it requires a new clutch. (ii) You send in money to a mail order company, however do not

  • Q : Competitive industry widespread

    When a competitive industry experiences widespread economic profits into the short run, in that case in the long run: (w) new firms will enter and prices will fall. (x) entry barriers will be erected. (y) resource costs must fall. (z) dominant firms b

  • Q : When is marginal costs equivalent to

    A purely competitive firm adjusts production therefore its marginal costs equivalent the market price, thus: (w) minimizing losses or maximizing profit. (x) ensuring that total costs do not exceed total revenue. (y) surviving the shor

  • Q : Relative Prices of household

    When a household consumes just x and y, a higher price of y and the stable price of x will make: (i) All goods cheaper relative to the x. (ii) x cheaper relative to the y. (iii) Real family income grow. (iv) Substitution against x the more desirable.

    Q : Determine income elasticity of demand

    An income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 implies that the demand for mass transit is/will: (1) a necessity. (2) a luxury. (3) rise at a slower rate than income. (4) fall when income rises. How can I s

  • Q : Minimum Supply Amounts of Resources

    Payments for a resource into excess of the minimum needed to supply specified amounts of the resource are termed as: (1) economic rents. (2) wage premiums. (3) excess profits. (4) surplus values. (5) capitalization.

    Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Unitarily elastic for all prices and

    On such demand curve for pizza as in below demonstrated graph, there demand is: (w) elastic for all prices and quantities demonstrated. (x) unitarily elastic for all prices and quantities shown. (y) elastic at high prices and inelastic at low prices. (z) inelastic at

  • Q : Problem on diminishing returns I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on diminishing returns. Please help me in the following question. The principle of diminishing marginal utility is a contrast of the law of: (1) Comparative consumer benefit. (2) Diminishing returns. (3) Effective explanation.