--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Sole Proprietorships and Partnerships

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. Relative to corporations, drawbacks to the owners of sole partnerships and proprietorships comprise:  (i) Unlimited liability. (2) Extreme government regulation. (3) Limited

  • Q : Match price cuts but avoid price hikes

    A firm’s perception which competitors will match price cuts but avoid price hikes yields: (w) price leadership behavior. (x) limit pricing structures. (y) kinked demand curves. (z) monopolistic competition. Can anybody sugges

  • Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Absolute value to specify price

    Though all the time a negative number that the ______ is commonly stated like an absolute value to specify discussions. (w) price elasticity of demand (x) income elasticity of demand (y) price cross elasticity of demand (z) price elasticity of supply<

  • Q : Horizontal demand curve facing purely

    The demand curve facing a purely competitive firm is: (w) horizontal. (x) vertical. (y) downward sloping. (z) the horizontal summation of individual demand curves. Can someone explain/help me with best solution abo

  • Q : Profit-maximizing firm at shutdown point

    When MR exceeds both marginal costs and average variable costs at the recent rate of production, in that case a profit-maximizing firm will: (w) increase output. (x) decrease output. (y) have no incentive to change output. (z) be maximizing profits.

  • Q : Illustration of long-run adjustment in

    A rising market demand for generic puffy cheese chips produces economic profits and makes a new firm to build a vast modern factory to bake puffy cheese chips. It is an illustration of: (i) monopoly power. (ii) adjustments in the mark

  • Q : Question on utility function Assume a

     Assume a consumer with the given utility function: U = 3y1y2 + 5. Suppose y2 = 1, derive the marginal utility schedule for y1. In what direction is it moving?

  • Q : Harmness of price discrimination Price

    Price discrimination generally harms: (w) all consumers and benefits firms along with market power. (x) all firms along with market power and benefits all consumers. (y) some consumers, when helping sellers and several other consumers. (z) all sellers

  • Q : Problem on Substitution effect for good

    One of my friend has a problem on substitution effect. The original equilibrium point (that is utility-maximizing bundle) in the graph shown below is at point A. The price of good Y is increased, pivoting the budget constraint down to its latest level.a. F