--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding monopsonistic

    I have a problem in economics on monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Labor union contracts, an analogous worth rule or the minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (1)

  • Q : Introduction of marginal utility The

    The marginal utility (MU) of a good: (1) Was first introduced by Adam Smith. (2) Is simply measured in dollars. (3) Is determined by society as an entire. (4) Reflects subjective preferences. Can someone help me in getting through

  • Q : Income Elasticities of Demand Question:

    Question: (a)  Suppose the income elasticity of demand for pre-recorded music compact disks is +4 and the income elasticity of demand for a cabinet maker's work is +0.4.  Compare the impact on pre-recorde

  • Q : Market adjustments due to raised

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : State marginal propensity to consume

    Marginal propensity to consume: It is stated as the measure of rate at which the aggregate consumption expenditure changes as the national income changes. MPC= C/Y

  • Q : Problem on decline in demand function

    In the month of January, Disney World in Florida cut its ticket prices into half and starts letting all kids beneath age five without charge. The economic forecaster might reasonably expect: (1) A decline in demand for the tickets to Disney Land in California. (2) A r

  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

  • Q : Question based on GDP In calculating

    In calculating the GDP national income accountants: A) treat inventory changes as an adjustment to personal consumption expenditures. B) ignore inventories because they do not represent final goods. C) subtract increases in inventories or add decreases in inventories.

  • Q : Question based on poverty rate Select

    Select the right ans wer of the question. Which of the following would we expect to contain the highest poverty rate? A) white households headed by males B) elderly white households C) white households headed by females D) African-American households headed by femal

  • Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm

    When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve