--%>

Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large

Why the Okun's Law Coefficient Is so Large? Okun's Law posits not a 1-to-1 relation but a 2.5-to-1 relationship between real GDP growth and the unemployment rate. That is, a one percentage-point fall in the unemployment rate is associated not with a 1 but a 2.5 percent boost in the level of production. Why is this Okun's Law coefficient so large? Why isn't it the case that a one percentage point fall in unemployment produces a one percent rise in output, or even less? One answer is that the unemployment rate, as officially measured, does not count discouraged workers. In a recession, the number of people at work falls, the number of people looking for work rises, and the number of people who are not looking for work because they doubt they could find jobs--but would be working if business conditions were better--rises. Because the conventionally-measured unemployment rate does not include these discouraged workers, more than a 1 percent rise in real GDP is needed to reduce the unemployment rate by 1 percentage point. Moreover, when business returns to normal, firms' initial response is not to hire more employees, but to ask existing employees to work longer hours. So average hours of work per week go up, and the unemployment rate falls by less than one would otherwise expect. Finally, in some industries employing more workers increases production by more than a proportional amount: product design and set-up need to be done only once, no matter how much is produced. Thus businesses which have economies of scale do not need twice as many workers to produce twice as much output.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price discrimination to increase

    A firm can practice price discrimination to increase its profitability when this: (w) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (x) is a pure quantity adjuster. (y) has some market power and is able to separate its customers into various groups alon

  • Q : Negatively sloped demand curve for

    The idea which harsher and more certain punishment decreases cheating on examinations recommends that: (i) Normative values must guide the positive economics. (ii) Student honesty has refused in recent years. (iii) Macroeconomic reasoning as well applies to microecono

  • Q : Marginal Utilities and Demand Prices

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Rational individual consumers tend to purchase goods until the relative market prices for each and every goods purchased are proportional to all individuals: (i) Cost or benefit ratio. (ii) Op

  • Q : Elasticity of supply Suppose that the

    Suppose that the price of peanut packets increases by 5 %, the quantity supplied of peanut increases by 8 %. Then what is the elasticity of supply? Answer: Es = Per

  • Q : What is Budget line Budget line : This

    Budget line: This refers to all combinations of goods that a consumer can purchase with his whole income and price of two goods.

  • Q : Relative concept about poverty A

    A predictable reluctance through modern welfare recipients to trade all they own for the material possessions of a rich person by a much earlier period would be evidence which poverty is: (w) easily solved by income redistribution pro

  • Q : Minimizes losses and maximizes profits

    When Firm B in demonstrated graph successfully minimizes losses and maximizes its profits that have: (1) covered overhead while incurring short-run economic losses. (2) potential economic profit of Pbgh per period. (3) total costs equal to 0phq2. (4)

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws problem Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The provisions of Taft Hartley Act did not proscribe: (i) Secondary boycotts. (ii) Closed shops. (iii) Jurisdictional strikes. (iv) Right-to-work laws.

  • Q : Relationship between MPP and APP If MPP

    If MPP equivalent to APP, what will you state regarding APP? Answer: APP is at its maximum and steady or constant.

  • Q : Destitute Percentage of Income The

    The percentage of American families that stay put destitute year after year is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problem