--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u

  • Q : Economic growth and development I have

    I have a problem in economics on Economic growth and progress. Please help me in the following question. The Economic growth in a proficient economy will be decreased by: (i) Investment in new capital. (ii) Technological advances. (iii) Expanding the

  • Q : Mixed economy of a market system

    Whenever compared to a mixed economy which relies primarily on the market system, the society which relies relatively greatly on brute force, queuing, and arbitrary selection tends to experience: (1) Powerful reducing returns. (2) Opportunity costs to drop. (3) Fast t

  • Q : How to recognize economics as a field

    recognize economics as a field of economics

  • Q : Population increase-Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Population increase-Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. The production-possibilities frontier can be shifted external by: (i) Removing unemployment. (ii) Lowering the market prices. (iii) A popul

  • Q : Validation of a new theory in

    A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute

  • Q : Comparative Systems-Socialism I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Comparative Systems- Socialism. Please help me in the following question. From roughly 1890 till year1990 or thus, the main challenger of capitalism was: (1) Monarchy. (2) Fascism. (3) Socialism. (4) Anarchism.

  • Q : Illustration of Opportunity Cost How

    How can I solve my economics problems? Please suggest me the accurate answer. Harry Homeowner pays three hundred dollar monthly upon a mortgage within a neighbourhood where matching houses rent for eight hundred dollar per month. T

  • Q : Limitations of economic resources Hey

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of economic resources that is given below: Resources (factors of production) do NOT comprise: (i) entrepreneurship. (ii) competition. (iii) land. (iv) capital. (

  • Q : Ownership of major non-labor resources

    I have a problem in economics on Ownership of major non-labor resources. Please help me in the following question. Government ownership of main non-labor resources is the characteristic of: (1) Capitalism. (2) Decentralization. (3) Anarchism. (4) Soci