--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrations of technological

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that illustrations of technological enhancement would not comprise developing new because: (i) Lighter and less costly and stro

  • Q : Worse off and better off condition in

    When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a va

  • Q : With whom is Economists LEAST concerned

    Economists are LEAST related along with the: (w) gains and losses from changes in government policies. (x) adjustments people make when tax structures change. (y) causes of inflation and unemployment. (z) ethics of political campaigning.

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

  • Q : Who thought Murderers do more harm than

    Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : Firm-production similar to output with

    When a firm could produce at least similar output with less of one resource and no additional of any other, mix of resources of the firm is technologically: (w) and economically efficient. (x) efficient, but economically inefficient. (y) inefficient, but economically

  • Q : Defining the term Money in Economic I

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that how is defining Money a form of: (i) basic economic resource. (ii) the capital stock., (iii) financial capital. and (iv) precious metal.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1432601 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1931540
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1432601

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.