--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid

  • Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

    In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

  • Q : Limitation of resource category of

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the economists’ resource category of “land” would not contain: (1) coal, petroleum, and other minerals. (2) the fish and water within the oce

  • Q : Closest to being a free good in

    The closest to being a free good of the one given would be: (i) a scholarship for a brilliant but impoverished student. (ii) Free “meals on wheels” programs for the aged and infirm, (iii) a winning lottery ticket you determined on the side

  • Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

  • Q : What is made by a progarm I need a good

    I need a good answer on the topic of scarcity economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that program, which gives health care at no charge to patients would create: (w) top quality health care obtainable to somebody. (x) health care a free goo

  • Q : Primarily dealing of positive economic

    Please help me to solve the problem of Positive Economics which is specified above. Positive economic statements deal primarily along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) Technically testable ec

  • Q : Problem regarding exceed human

    The fact that human requirements exceed the production possible along with the resources obtainable is termed as economic: (1) scarcity, (2) welfare, (3) shortage and (4) deficits. Can someone please suggest me the