--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

    In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

    		•
  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

    		•
  • Q : People moods towards Positive Economics

    Average men are innately further perceptive than average women within ascertaining people’s moods and predicting behavior, when average women classically have relatively better depth perception and intrinsically more precise geometric intuition. So, the precedin

    		•
  • Q : Illustrates the problem of Productive

    At present, at Bob's Candle shop, Arjuna and Krishna share the jobs of making molds and making candles. Nonetheless, while Arjuna is best at making molds and Krishna is much better at creating the candles, then: (a) Bob’s shop is experiencing allocative although

    		•
  • Q : Comparative Systems-Socialism I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Comparative Systems- Socialism. Please help me in the following question. From roughly 1890 till year1990 or thus, the main challenger of capitalism was: (1) Monarchy. (2) Fascism. (3) Socialism. (4) Anarchism.

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

    		•
  • Q : Determine the Supply and Demand in

    This vigorously competitive clothing market is at firstly in equilibrium at S0 and D0. When the moves in the demand for clothing to D1 occurred before the transfer in supply to S1, in that case: (1) the primary signal to fir

    		•
  • Q : What does an unessential complicated

    Unessential complicated theories violate: (w) common sense. (x) the principle of nonsatiety. (y) the laws of demand and supply. (z) Occam's razor. Please gues I really need one good answer from the above options.

    		•
  • Q : Allocative mechanisms of Economic

    Economic systems (example: capitalism versus socialism) are mainly distinguished by their relative reliance on alternative allocative mechanisms, and particularly by: (1) Who builds major economic decisions and who owns non-human resources. (ii) The level of inequalit

    		•
  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

    		•