--%>

Majority worse off and minority better off of population

When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people are better off and several are worse off. (y) neither socially good nor bad since the welfare losses now offset the gains. (z) Nothing can be said about social welfare during this case without a value judgment.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : The closest illustration of a free good

    Which would be the closest illustration of a free good: (1) A can of tuna bought along with food stamps, (2) dead leaves which require raking into fall, (3) water through a drinking fountain at a park, (4) a sample of soap acquired in the mail and (5)

  • Q : Comparative Systems-Socialism I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Comparative Systems- Socialism. Please help me in the following question. From roughly 1890 till year1990 or thus, the main challenger of capitalism was: (1) Monarchy. (2) Fascism. (3) Socialism. (4) Anarchism.

  • Q : Explain invisible hand of Adam Smith

    The “invisible hand” of Adam Smith described: (w) a large role for the government. (x) altruist motives in civilized society. (y) technological advances promoted throguh monopolies. (z) self-correcting market mechanisms.

  • Q : Firm-production similar to output with

    When a firm could produce at least similar output with less of one resource and no additional of any other, mix of resources of the firm is technologically: (w) and economically efficient. (x) efficient, but economically inefficient. (y) inefficient, but economically

  • Q : Existence problem regarding each and

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for existence problem regarding every society. Every society should answer questions regarding “How?, for Whom? and What?” due to the exist

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Example of Normative Macroeconomics

    To say that high joblessness rates in this prosperous country are a national disgrace would be an illustration of a: (w) normative macroeconomic statement. (x) positive macroeconomic statement. (y) positive microeconomic statement. (z) normative microeconomic statemen

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

  • Q : Limitation of resource category of

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the economists’ resource category of “land” would not contain: (1) coal, petroleum, and other minerals. (2) the fish and water within the oce

  • Q : Illustrate when firm shuts down

    When a firm shuts down within the short run,: w) its loss equals zero. x) its loss equals its fixed cost. y) is creates zero economic profit. z) its total revenue is not huge adequate to cover its fixed cost. How c