--%>

Increasing Costs-Production possibilities frontiers

The Production possibilities frontiers (or PPFs) tend to be ‘bowed out’ since: (i) More of one good mandates the lower production of other. (ii) A few resources are inevitably underutilized or unemployed. (iii) Technology is supposed constant. (iv) Resources differ in suitability for various forms of production.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Econometrics

  • Q : Social costs of producing goods The

    The absolute value of the slope of production possibilities frontier equivalents the: (i) Aggregate Supply curve. (ii) Net economic efficacy of the society. (iii) Aggregate Demand curve. (iv) Relative social costs of generating goods. (v) Rate of tech

  • Q : Circular Flows-Combine resources The

    The structure of a circular flow model prevents the possibility that corporations eventually: (1) Generate goods. (2) Produce revenue by selling the products. (3) Combine the resources inefficiently. (4) Bear the load of lost purchasing power from tax

  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms-Markets Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the accurate answer from the given options. Production which is most compatible with the consumer tastes and preferences is more probable whenever allocation is decided by: (1) Queuing. (2) Majority voting. (3) Indiv

  • Q : Illustration of the difference in

    In a current Wendy’s TV commercial, a police officer hands a driver a speeding ticket for $75. The response of driver is something to the consequence of as, “Oh gentleman! 75 crispy chicken nuggets!” The response of driver is mainly specific an illus

  • Q : Effect of Diminishing Returns on

    Since an economy moves all along a concave (or bowed-out) production possibilities frontier, the: (i) Cost rises for the good whose production increases. (ii) Net value of output should raise. (iii) Unemployment rate drops, however inflation creeps up

  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms-Absorption of

    The huge absorption of resources for the arms race among the United States and USSR from the year1945 to 1990 is an instance of inefficiencies related with the allocative method of: (1) Queuing. (2) Arbitrary selection. (3) Brute force. (4) Capitalism

  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms-Tradition I have

    I have a problem in economics on Allocative Mechanisms-Tradition. Please help me in the following question. The society in which your occupation is stated by your parent’s jobs probably inadequately bases too much decision on: (1) Queuing. (2) Brute force. (3) T

  • Q : ECONOMETRICS PROBLEM MORE EXAMPLE OF

    MORE EXAMPLE OF THE ABOVE TITLE AND SOLUTION OF D/T WORK OUT .HELP ME PLEACE!!

  • Q : Law of comparative advantage Can

    Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The law of comparative benefit exhibits: (a) Why trade with a country in which salaries are low is not fair. (b) How countries try to use each other via trade. (c)

  • Q : US production capacity during war Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The economic impact of the World War II on U.S. civilian living standards was: (w) Rigorous since military production skyrocketed. (x) Worse than in almost any other enemy cou