--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game

ACE and BEST are the only two grocery stores within a remote small town in North Dakota. There owners as each other very small, and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never identify. That payoff matrix: (w) advises that the grocers maximize their joint profits while each follows a dominant strategy. (x) contains no clearly dominant strategy. (y) is an illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game. (z) indicates that each grocer will make $125,000 annually by pursuing a dominant strategy.

960_Prisoners Dilemma1.png

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Follow the Dominant Strategy Assuming

    Assuming that Venezuela and Indonesia both follow the dominant strategy as: (1) each will earn $8 billion in profit. (2) neither country will cheat. (3) both countries will do better when both cheat. (4) Venezuela will cheat and Indonesia will receive

    		•
  • Q : According to game theory in Nash

    According to game theory, when there are multiple Nash equilibria for a repeated game in that case: (w) once one Nash is selected this will be maintained, and all else constant. (x) any Nash equilibrium may be chosen as the first equi

    		•
  • Q : Explain Nash equilibrium with an example

    In this payoff matrix as in illustrated, when the husband gets to choose first: (w) he will watch the film and his wife will play golf. (x) he will play golf and his wife will see the film. (y) they will both play golf. (z) they will both see the film.

    Q : Game theory according to oligopolists

    The game theory approach supposes that oligopolists: (w) do not maximize profit. (x) act strategically. (y) are actually monopolists in disguise. (z) maximize revenue. I need a good answer on the t

    		•
  • Q : Zero Sum Games A “ winner-take-all ”

    A “winner-take-all” game of poker is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) non-zero sum game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given

    		•
  • Q : Illustrations of cooperative games An

    An instant of a noncooperative game would be: (w) consequences for non-confessors in a classic prisoner’s dilemma. (x) collective bargaining. (y) courtship and marriage. (z) plea bargaining. Can someone expla

    		•
  • Q : Illustrate Dominant Strategy The

    The dominant strategies in this payoff matrix are for: (w) neither Venezuela nor Indonesia to cheat, thus ensuring that each gets $8 billion profit. (x) both Venezuela and Indonesia to cheat, so receiving $5 billion profit each. (y) the greatest payof

    		•
  • Q : Divide total profit with profit

    Red Hat wants to raise the power of Linux to attract Windows all users. Therefore Microsoft is planning Windows Minus, a weaker version to compete along with Linux. All can sell low, medium or high powered versions of the new software, although each consequently shoul

    		•
  • Q : NOT including competition in

    Illustrations of cooperative games do not comprise: (1) collective bargaining, in which the firms and unions bargain over employment. (2) international treaties that regulate trade. (3) pure competition. (4) plea bargaining between prosecutors and def

    		•
  • Q : Competitive prices and efficiency and

    When all industries were purely competitive and externalities were not present and when the distribution of income was viewed as fair by consensus of the population, in that case the marginal value to society of an extra unit of a goo

    		•