--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game

ACE and BEST are the only two grocery stores within a remote small town in North Dakota. There owners as each other very small, and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never identify. That payoff matrix: (w) advises that the grocers maximize their joint profits while each follows a dominant strategy. (x) contains no clearly dominant strategy. (y) is an illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game. (z) indicates that each grocer will make $125,000 annually by pursuing a dominant strategy.

960_Prisoners Dilemma1.png

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Game theory according to second mover

    Mr. Smith needs someone to mow his lawn and is interviewing a potential lawnmower, Sam. Throughout the interview, there Mr. Smith refuses to tell Sam what wage he is willing to pay Sam till Sam tells him how much he is willing to work for. Mr. Smith is playing a game

    		•
  • Q : Problem on second mover strategy When

    When two shy people probable to experience eternal bliss together never get to identify each other well since each fears asking the other for a date, both apparently believe this best to pursue a: (i) second mover strategy. (ii) roll-over strategy. (iii) collective ba

    		•
  • Q : Grim Strategy When Tia would respond by

    When Tia would respond by never again cooperating within a long sequence of repeated transaction when Carmen ever failed to cooperate, in that case Tia would be following: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) tit-for-tat. (3) domino strategy. (4) grim strategy. (5) cut-throat co

    		•
  • Q : NO net incentives to change current

    Rivals with no net incentives to modify their current strategies within a repeating sequence of games have arrived at a location of: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) static churn. (3) classical steady state. (4) the invisible hand. (5) tactical impasse.

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of cooperative game Tom

    Tom and Jill and John are the merely remaining contestants upon the TV show Survivor. Both Tom and Jill secretly collude to divide the million dollars for winning, as well as vote John off the island. Therefore their agreement is an illustration of a: (1) grim strateg

    		•
  • Q : Game Theory and Oligopoly Economists

    Economists would be probably to apply game theory to the market structure of: (1) oligopoly. (2) perfect competition. (3) pure monopoly. (4) labor unions. (5) monopolistic competition. Please choos

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Example of Nash equilibrium In this

    In this payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure, when the wife gets to choose first: (w) she will watch the film and her husband will play golf. (x) she will play golf and her husband will go to the movies. (y) they will both play golf. (z) they will both go to the th

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-Tat in Dynamic Games Assume

    Assume that Kevin and Margeaux play a repeated game in that they can choose to act either cooperatively or non cooperatively. When on the third round, Kevin reacts cooperatively and Margeaux react uncooperatively: (1) and both use tit-for-tat strategy

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of a Zero-Sum Game An

    An illustration of a zero-sum game is: (w) a baseball game. (bx) a mugging. (y) a cartel. (z) the prisoner's dilemma. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics