--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game

ACE and BEST are the only two grocery stores within a remote small town in North Dakota. There owners as each other very small, and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never identify. That payoff matrix: (w) advises that the grocers maximize their joint profits while each follows a dominant strategy. (x) contains no clearly dominant strategy. (y) is an illustration of a prisoner’s dilemma game. (z) indicates that each grocer will make $125,000 annually by pursuing a dominant strategy.

960_Prisoners Dilemma1.png

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Second Mover Advantage India asserts

    India asserts which this will begin disarming only after Pakistan begins to disarm. Policy of India reflects belief in: (1) mutually assured destruction. (2) second mover advantage. (3) predatory behavior. (4) accommodation. (5) single play strategy.

    Q : Noncooperative Games ACE and BEST are

    ACE and BEST are the simply two grocery stores within a remote small town into North Dakota. The owners like each other very small and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never know. When both t

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding to Grim Strategy When

    When after being betrayed by Cameron, Karla holds a grudge forever as well as is nasty to Cameron no issue what Cameron does later to try to make amends, Karla would be pursuing a: (1) burned bridges strategy. (2) tit-for-tat strategy. (3) grim strategy. (4) limited b

    		•
  • Q : Strategies of companies for Nash

    In this payoff matrix for the location strategies of companies: (w) BEST will choose to go to location 1 and ACE will choose to go to location 2. (x) BEST will choose to go to location 2 and ACE will choose to go to location 1. (y) there is no Nash equilibrium. (z) th

    		•
  • Q : Grim Strategy in Nash Equilibrium A

    A strategy combination where every player is playing a best response to other players' current strategies, and therefore has no incentive to change strategies in a repeating game is termed as: (1) zero-sum equilibrium. (2) the first mover advantage. (3) tit-for-tat. (

    		•
  • Q : Example of a positive-sum game An

    An illustration of a positive-sum game could be: wa) trade between two countries according to the law of comparative advantage. (x) a robbery in which $1000 changes hands and no one is hurt. (y) a robbery in which $1000 changes hands and the mugger is

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding to zero sum games

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year’s Kentucky Derby is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) tit-for-tat game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo

    		•
  • Q : Second Mover Strategy Assume that a car

    Assume that a car dealer tries to acquire a prospective buyer to “tell me your highest probable offer for this car, and we will see when that’s acceptable,” although a customer insists, “I will decide whether to buy after you make your lowest p

    		•
  • Q : Flip-flop Strategy in Game Theory

    Famous categories of strategic games do not comprise: (1) grim strategy. (2) tit-for-tat. (3) cooperative games. (4) flip-flop strategy. (5) first mover strategies. How can I solve my Economics pro

    		•