--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Liquidity Ratios Liquidity Ratios :

    Liquidity Ratios: Such ratios comprise the Current Ratio and the Quick Ratio or the acid test ratio. Liquidity ratios demonstrate the Liquid position of a company in the short term that is the capability of a firm to pay its obligations in short term.

    		•
  • Q : State Exploitation of favorable market

    Exploitation of favorable market conditions: The firms after estimating WCR are in a position to clearly identify their status of excess current assets. After this realization they can use this knowledge to encash conditions arising in market even for

    		•
  • Q : Is there any optimal capital structure

    Is there any optimal capital structure?

    		•
  • Q : Cost of Equity AB Corporation has 16%

    AB Corporation has 16% cost of equity, 35% tax rate, and debt-to-equity ratio of 30%. XY Corporation has 30% tax rate and debt-to-equity ratio of 40%. Both AB and XY are in the same business of selling automotive parts. If the riskless rate is 4% and the expected retu

    		•
  • Q : What is the impact of auto portfolio

    What is the impact of auto portfolio into the quotation of the shares?

    		•
  • Q : Expected return for a portfolio What is

    What is the expected return for a portfolio consisting of 200 shares of Nike, 200 shares of Home Depot, and 400 shares of Intel if their expected returns are 10%, 8% and 12% respectively, and their current prices are $25, $50, and $25 per share respec

    		•
  • Q : Convertible Bonds-Corporate Bonds State

    State the term Convertible Bonds in Corporate Bonds?

    		•
  • Q : APR of Loan When you take out an $8,000

    When you take out an $8,000 car loan that calls for 48 monthly payments of $225 each, then what is the APR of loan?

    		•
  • Q : Explain Butterfly Spread Strategies

    Butterfly Spread Strategies: In this strategy, there is no limit on the number of options that can be combined to form the butterfly spread. This strategy essentially combines both the bear spread and the bull spread. In this case, options with three

    		•
  • Q : Long-Term Financing Needed Long-Term

    Long-Term Financing Needed : - At year-end 2012, total assets for Ambrose Inc. were $1.2 million and accounts payable were $375,000. Sales, which in 2012 were $2.5 million, are expected to increase by 25% in 2013. Total ass

    		•