--%>

How present value of tax shields be calculated

I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too higher than the first one, but here which of the two is better?

E

Expert

Verified

Fernández (2001) demonstrates that discounting the tax shields along with the Ku and the WACC is not right. There are six habitual expressions to compute the value of tax shields that are frequently used. Just three of them are valid (they have a theoretical origin):

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963), while the company plans to return the existing debt without making a newest one; Miles-Ezzell (1980) while the company plans its debt proportionally to market value of shares; and also Fernández (2004), while the company plans its debt proportionally to book value of the assets or shares.

Fernández (2004): VTS = VA [D Ku T; Ku].

Miles-Ezzell (1980): VA[Ku; D T Kd] (1+Ku)/ (1+Kd)

Myers (1974) and Modigliani-Miller (1963): VTS = VA[Kd; D T Kd]. Other incorrect formulae to calculate the value of tax shields are:

Damodaran (1994): VA [Ku; DTKu – D (Kd – RF) (1–T)];

Practitioners: VA [Ku; DTKd – D(Kd – RF)]

Harris-Pringle (1985) y Ruback (1995, 2002): VA [Ku; D T Kd]

Myers (1974) has to be used only while it is possible to know with whole certainty the amount of the debt at any future instant. Miles y Ezzell (1980) has to be used only when the future debt is proportional to market value of the shares that we are not aware of any company which manages its debt in such a way. Fernández (2004) has to be used only when the risk of the future raise of the debt is the same to that of the FCF.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Yield to maturity problem Jenny is

    Jenny is looking to invest in some 5-year bonds which pay annual coupons of 6.25 % and are presently selling at $912.34. What is the present market yield on these bonds? (Round to the closest Answer.) (1) 9.5%  (2) 8.5%  (3) 6.5%  (4) 7.5%

  • Q : Explain the model of Heath Explain the

    Explain the model of Heath, Jarrow and Morton regarding tree building or Monte Carlo simulation.

  • Q : Assignment help for Financial Statement

    HW I: Show your approach to each problem (formulas, variables, etc.) You can use Excel sheet formulas to show the work or use the Finance calculator terms. For the ABC answers: choose the correct answer and delete the rest.

  • Q : Explain Corporate Development Corporate

    Corporate Development: Corporate development is a term which references the range of planning options and strategies which can assist to move a company toward its targets. The procedure of this kind of strategic development can be exerted to just abou

  • Q : Efficiency Ratios Efficiency Ratios :

    Efficiency Ratios: These ratios comprise Receivables Turnover, Inventory Turnover, Asset Turnover and Net Working Capital Turnover ratios. Efficiency ratios show the utilization of Assets of the company thus as to generate Revenue that is, the best ut

  • Q : Markets are expected to be Volatile

    When Markets are expected to be Volatile: For the bear and bull strategy to yield gains, it is essential that the trader takes a view on the direction of the market i.e. either bearish or bullish, and accordingly implement the strategic choice. More o

  • Q : Explain breakthroughs on

    Explain breakthroughs on low-discrepancy sequences.

  • Q : Problem on Bank branch networks While

    While banks across the United States and Europe are cutting down their number of branches, the number of bank branches in Hong Kong has increased in the same period. Hong Kong Monetary Authority statistics show the number of bank branches in Hong Kong at the end of 20

  • Q : Analysis on Stock Prices Using the last

    Using the last 3 years of closing stock prices on the first trading day of each month from January,  2010 through December 2012 for Apple (APPL) and the S&P 500 (market) for the same date range 1)    &n

  • Q : Explain few Spanish mutual funds

    Is this true that very little Spanish mutual funds outperform their benchmark? Isn’t this strange?