--%>

Formally adopt inflation targeting

Question: Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%.

Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : What are the criteria of issuing stocks

    What are the criteria of issuing stocks or bonds?

  • Q : What are the limitations of Circular

    What are the limitations of Circular Flow Model?

  • Q : Market efficiency while transaction

    Transaction costs tend to be decreased and markets are more efficient when: (w) the government subsidizes a good. (x) inter-market price differentials are eliminated through arbitrage. (y) taxes are used to give for social wants. (z) regulations close

  • Q : Elucidate facilitating factors that

    Elucidate facilitating factors that explain the growth of trade?

  • Q : Explain and give an illustration

    Explain and give an illustration of (a) the fallacy of composition; and (b) the “after this, therefore because of this” fallacy.  Why are cause-and-effect relationships difficult to isolate in the social sciences?

  • Q : Illustration of Absolute and Relative

    The price of KnickKnacks is $1 and the price of WigWags has increased with $2 to $3. Therefore:  (w) absolute price of KnickKnacks has decreased and the relative price of WigWags has increased. (x) relative and absolute prices of KnickKnacks have

  • Q : Illustrate how Microeconomics looks at

    Illustrate how Microeconomics looks at specific economic units?

  • Q : Principle of comparative advantage When

    When Gene can make three pairs of cowboy boots per week or one saddle whereas Roy can make either two pairs of boots or two saddles, Gene will form boots whereas Roy makes saddles according to the: (i) Law of Occam’s Razor. (ii) Principle of comparative advantag

  • Q : Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

    Question: Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their r

  • Q : Fixed or managed exchange rate

    Question: A country with a fixed or managed exchange rate would consider i.___________________ its currency to gain competitive advantage vis-à-vis its trade