--%>

Fiscal Monetary changes

With the general equilibrium framework in place, the stage is now set for introducing fiscal and monetary changes and analysing their effects on the general equilibrium. We will first introduce a fiscal change in the form of increase in deficit-financed expenditure, and then introduce a discretionary increase in money supply, and look into their effect on the equilibrium rate of interest and the income level. Finally, we will analyse the combined effects of the simultaneous fiscal and monetary changes.


Effect of fiscal changes in general equilibrium framework

The effect of change in government spending on the national income, ?Y = ?G X G-multiplier . But, in the general equilibrium framework, the result is significantly different. Why? This is the issue of this section. To begin with, recall the analysis of increase in deficit financed ?G of $100 bullion on the product market equilibrium. We gave shown there how a ?G  causes shift in the  IS  curve. Here, we discuss the effect of  ?G of $100 billion  on the general equilibrium. We know that ?G causes and upward shift in the is curve and, thereby, a rise in the equilibrium income. The new IS-function can be estimated as follows.

The demand side of the product market equilibrium equation reads as

I + G + ?G = 200 - 2000i + 100 = 300 - 2000i

And supply side, in our example, reads as  S +T = - 100 + 0.4Y . Recall also that by using these equations, we can derive a new IS  schedule with ?G = 100 . The process is reproduced below.

I + G + ?G = S + T

300 - 2000i = - 100 + 0.4Y

Y = 1000 - 5000i


The  ISt   schedule intersects the LM0   schedule at point  B  note that pre-?G  equilibrium was at point A. the shift in the equilibrium point from  A to B,  shows that, with ?G = $100 billion  and no change I money supply, the equilibrium level of income increases form $475 billion to $600 billion and interest rate rises to 8%.

This can also be proved algebraically given the  ISt  schedule in  and LM0   schedule as Y = 200 + 5000 I,  , the product and money market equilibrium equation can be written as, 

1000-5000i = 200 + 5000i

I = 0.08 or 8%

By substitution 0.08   for I   , we get the equilibrium Y   as 

Y = 1000 - 5000 (0.08)  

Y = 600 billion


It is important to note here that an increase in the government spending increases both the rate of interest and the level of income. If is more important to note that ?Y < ?G X G - multiplier . This is so because of what economists call crowding-out effect of public expenditure.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Long-term Federal government budget

    Question: Explain why there are long-term Federal government budget problems.   Explain why the base-line forecast of the CBO is misleading. Include in your answer why solutions to the problem will necessarily involve a decision about which

  • Q : Value added technique for national

    What is the alternative name of value added technique of estimating national income? The alternative name of value added technique of estimating national income is production method.

  • Q : Federal fiscal stimulus in 2009

    Question: Was the stimulus package passed in 2009 as success?  In answering this question the focus should be the articles on the syllabus, but you should also include opinions of other commentators. &nbs

  • Q : Economic growth model Explain the main

    Explain the main features of Harrod - Domar Growth model. How does the Harrod Domar model explain the occurrence of trade cycles?

  • Q : Demand curves when longer periods are

    Whenever longer periods are considered and hence bigger ranges of adjustments (that is, substitutions) become probable, demand curves tend to become: (i) Flatter, and therefore do supply curves. (ii) Flatter, as supply curves become steeper. (iii) Ste

  • Q : Formula for Fiscal deficit Fiscal

    Fiscal deficit: Fiscal deficit is stated as the surplus of total expenditure over total receipts, apart from borrowings. Fiscal deficit = Total expenditure (Rev. Exp. + Cap. Exp.) – Total Receipts

  • Q : Positional Goods problem Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In accord with the theories of Thorstein Veblen, the positional goods from which the owner or user of the good derives the jollies mainly since of the power, class and status signaled by the p

  • Q : Problem related to rising GDP Between

    Between 1961 and 2007, the rising share of the Canadian population in paid employment contributed to rising GDP per person. But suppose that the share of the Canadian population in paid employment had remained constant between 1961 and 2007. What would Canadian GDP pe

  • Q : Rates of addiction and existence in a

    Harsher punishments for drug dealers than for addicts can’t be blamed for higher: (1) rates of police corruption because main dealers can present big bribes. (2) rates of street crime by addicts. (3) profits reaped by successful pushers who are uncaught. (4) rat

  • Q : Problem on diminishing marginal utility

    An illustration of how marginal utility diminishes takes place when: (1) Derek finds it tough to laugh politely when he hears a “new” joke for the fourth time now. (2) Amy Sue chooses she would instead have 150 hogs than 151 on her pig far