--%>

Fee-simple private property rights

I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to lend your car to the neighbor. (3) Commit victimless crimes devoid of penalty. (4) Burn your home to assemble insurance. (5) Abuse your child.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : High rates of saving and investment Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Production possibilities frontiers can be employed to demonstrate why maximizing economic growth needs: (1) The amount of investment goods to equivalent the quantity of consum

  • Q : Uses of positive economic analysis Hey

    Hey friends I need your help for given problem: Positive economic analysis would be least helpful like a guide to how a society can decrease: (w) specific criminal behavior from punishment. (x) inequality within th

  • Q : Gains from trade and economic consensus

    While considering current events and matters, economists and the common public seem to disagree relatively the most about: (i) what to do regarding the War in Iraq. (ii) whether Democrats or Republicans must win the next election. (iii) the relative costs and advantag

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Erroneous analysis LEAST attributable

    The erroneous analysis that economists seldom agree is LEAST attributable to the fact such that economists are: (w) acquire little media coverage while they agree, when disputes about how economic theory must be translated in policy a

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

  • Q : Illustration of Self Interest Elmer

    Elmer leaves his old mule Betsy and buys a new tractor to plow his fields. It is assumed to be consistent along with Elmer's perception of his best interest since: (w) tractors can plow more than a mule. (x) Elmer is assumed to be a rational farmer. (

  • Q : Determine the essence of positive

    The essence of positive economic statements is which they: (1) should be correct, or they turn into normative statements. (2) yield predictions which can be tested for validity. (3) clearly resolve ethical or moral matters. (4) focus upon cheerful in

  • Q : Fee-simple property rights I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Fee-simple property rights. Please help me in the following question. Fee-simple property rights are a broad division of: (i) Common law. (ii) Positive externalities. (iii) Negative externalities. (iv) Public property