--%>

Explain the definition of WACC

An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we have seen within our class. Are they right?

E

Expert

Verified

No. This given formula is not the definition of WACC but it is of required return to the shares of the unlevered company (Ku).

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Is it correct to use valuation of

    Is this correct to use in the valuation of the shares of a certain company the “the real net assets value” which, as per to the Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC), shows the “book value of shareholder’s equity, corrected through increa

  • Q : Is cash flow is a flow of cash to

    The often known as "cash flow" that is net income plus depreciation, is a flow of cash, but is this a flow to the company or to the shareholders?

  • Q : Real estate problem Eric Rowan is

    Eric Rowan is planning to buy a house for $155,000 by borrowing money at the rate of 9%. He expects to rent the house for 5 years, collecting $20,000 annual rent in advance each year. He thinks that he can sell the house for $175,000 after five years. Fulton has incom

  • Q : How present value of tax shields be

    I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too high

  • Q : Assessing market expectations using CAPM

    Assume that the risk-free rate is 1% and the expected market return is 9%. You are considering purchasing Super Soft stock, which currently sells for $100 a share and will pay its next (annual) dividend of $1.00 exactly one year from today. Super Soft is considered to

  • Q : Illustrates beta and capital structure

    We are valuing a company, many smaller than ours, so as to buy it. As that company is too smaller than ours this will have no influence on the capital structure and at the risk of the resulting company. It is the reason why I believe this the beta and the capital stru

  • Q : Problem on sales collections The 2010

    The 2010 income statements of Leggett and Platt, inc. reports net sales of $4,076.1 million in 2010 and $4,250 million in 2009. The balance sheet reports accounts and other receivables, net of $550.5 million at December 31, 2010 and $640.2 million at December 31, 2009

  • Q : Is ROE a correct measurement of return

    The ROE is the ratio among net income and Shareholders’ equity. The meaning of Return on Equity is return to shareholders. Therefore, is ROE a correct measurement of the return to shareholders?

  • Q : What is the current example of a value

    What is the current example of a value company and would you buy it as an investment. Why or why not?

  • Q : Explain deducing yield curve model

    Explain deducing yield curve model of HJM.