--%>

Explain and give an illustration

Explain and give an illustration of (a) the fallacy of composition; and (b) the “after this, therefore because of this” fallacy.  Why are cause-and-effect relationships difficult to isolate in the social sciences?

E

Expert

Verified

(a) The fallacy of composition is the mistake of believing that something true for an individual part is necessarily true for the whole.  Example:  A single auto producer can increase its profits by lowering its price and taking business away from its competitors.  But matched price cuts by all auto manufacturers will not necessarily yield higher industry profits.

(b) The “after this, therefore because of this” fallacy is incorrectly reasoning that when one event precedes another, the first even necessarily caused the second.  Example:  Interest rates rise, followed by an increase in the rate of inflation, leading to the erroneous conclusion that the rise in interest rates caused the inflation.  Actually higher interest rates slow inflation.

Cause-and-effect relationships are difficult to isolate because “other things” are continually changing.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Illustrate 2nd function to promote and

    Illustrate the 2nd function to promote and maintain competition?

  • Q : Labour economic Can someone help me in

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Taft Hartley Act of 1946 made it illegal to encompass a: (1) Right-to-work law passed by the state legislature. (2) Conviction for the misdemeanor and serve as union officer. (3) Union for the agricultural migrants or go

  • Q : Example of public goods Drinking at a

    Drinking at a public water fountain is: (w) a public good because anyone may drink from it. (x) results in a negative externality because others can’t drink from this at similar time. (y) a positive externality because you are benefiting by other’s provisi

  • Q : Gains from the Exchange Even people who

    Even people who are extremely good at everything couldn’t encompass: (i) absolute benefits in approximately everything. (ii) Much higher incomes than average. (iii) Comparative benefits in everything. (iv) Superior natural endowments of talent.

    Q : Distribution of income and wealth in a

    Of the given options, the economist whose theories pivoted least upon the distribution of income and wealth (class conflict) in a capitalist system would have been: (1) Adam Smith. (2) David Ricardo. (3) Karl Marx. (4

  • Q : Explain the term Earnings per share

    Briefly explain the term Earnings per share (or EPS)?

  • Q : Describe the types of multiplant firms

    Describe the types of multiplant firms?

  • Q : Economic crisis situation in Europe

    Question: Describe the present economic crisis situation in Europe.   Why has it been so difficult for the Europeans to find a solution to this problem?   Comment on what implications the crisis may have for the rest of the world i

  • Q : Explain the cause of Trade barriers

    Explain the cause of Trade barriers?

  • Q : Maximizes profits in a perfectly

    Which of the given is not true for a firm within perfect competition: w) Profit equivalents total revenue minus total cost. x) Price equivalents average revenue. y) Average revenue is greater than marginal revenue. z) Marginal revenue equivalents the