--%>

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Increasing-cost industries average

    Within increasing-cost industries average there are: (w) production costs fall as output increases. (x) production costs rise as the number of firms in the industry grows. (y) production costs rise when the number of firms into the industry falls. (z)

  • Q : Supply of Labor-Income and Substitution

    I have a problem in economics on Supply of Labor: Income and Substitution Effects. Please help me in the following question. When the income effect of higher wage rate is more influential than the substitution effect, then: (1) The supply curve of labor is positively

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand at high and

    Moving by left to right along demand curve D, then price elasticity of demand for cheesy fried grits of Pixie is mostly: (w) positive, then unitary, then negative. (x) constant and equivalent to one. (y) greater at high prices than at low prices. (z)

  • Q : Negative slope of market-Law of demand

    I have a problem in economics on Negative slope of market-Law of demand. Please help me in the following question. The negative slope of the market demand curves for normal goods areleast persuaded by: (i) Diminishing marginal utility.  (ii) Inco

  • Q : Ceiling price problem When the

    When the government obliged a ceiling price of P0 on papayas, the market scarcity would correspond to line: (1) ab. (2) cd. (3) ac. (4) bd. (5) ae. </span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Bond Prices and Interest Rates When you

    When you buy a bond at an interest rate of 15 percent and sell it while the interest rate is 10 percent, then you will: (w) receive more than you paid for the bond. (x) receive less than you paid for the bond. (y) receive similar amount that you paid

  • Q : Labor Contracts and Shop Agreements

    From the point of view of management, the favored union membership ranking (that is, most favored to least favored) would be: (i) Closed shop, union shop, agency shop and open shop. (ii) Open shop, agency shop, union shop and closed shop. (iii) Agency shop, open shop,

  • Q : Define feature of perfectly inelastic

    A perfectly inelastic demand curve: (w) is an imaginary mathematical construct, and does not exist within reality. (x) corresponds to a perfectly horizontal line. (y) represents a good which absorbs only a small portion of consumers’ budgets. (z

  • Q : Monopsony Power-janitorial service Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The employer least probable to encompass monopsony power would be: (i) The janitorial service firm in Chicago. (ii) Police force in the Clemson, South Carolina. (iii) U.S. Navy. (iv) Sports sh

  • Q : Economic efficiency for pure competition

    Pure competition yields economic efficiency through: (w) punishing profit maximizing behavior. (x) forcing firms to adopt the least costly technologies available. (y) generating high profits as incentives. (z) rewarding entrepreneurs