Compliance approach in ethical conduct of a company

Question

Illustrates the compliance approach?

Answer 1

The compliance approach:

Anywhere from brightness to forceful compliance is preferential at companies whose managers bend toward being somewhat amoral but are very concerned about having ethically upstanding reputations or are amoral and see powerful compliance techniques as the best method to enforce and impose ethical rules and high ethical principles. Companies that adopt a compliance form usually do some or all of the following to show their commitment to ethical conduct: create the code of ethics a regular and visible part of communications with employees, appoint a main ethics officer or ethics ombudsperson, implement ethics training programs, have ethics committees to give guidance on ethics matters, institute formal processes for investigating supposed ethics violations, conduct ethics audits to calculate and document fulfillment, provide ethics awards to employees for outstanding efforts to make an ethical climate and enhance ethical performance, and/or install ethics hotlines to help deter and detect violations. Emphasis here is generally on securing broad compliance and measuring the amount to which ethical principles are observed and upheld. One of the weaknesses of the compliance approach is that the moral control exists in the company’s policy of ethics and in the ethics compliance system rather than in an individual’s personal moral liability for ethical behavior.