Suppose that instead of using an abatement standard the


Assume for simplicity that there are two identified point sources discharging chemical wastes into a local water body. Currently, each source releases 30 units of effluent, for a total of 60 units. To

a. Suppose the government allocates the abatement responsibility equally across the two point sources so that each must abate 15 units of effluent. Graphically illustrate this policy, and explain why this abatement allocation does not yield a cost-effective solution. Support your answer numerically.

b. What cost condition is required for the government's abatement allocation to be cost- effective?

c. Suppose that instead of using an abatement standard, the government institutes an effluent fee of $40 per unit of pollution. How many units of pollution would each point source abate? Is the $40 fee a cost-effective strategy for meeting the 30-unit abatement standard? Explain.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Microeconomics: Suppose that instead of using an abatement standard the
Reference No:- TGS01213075

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)