Case Study:
1. What sorts of insights do John Caputo and Zygmunt Bauman give us into the moral demands made upon the whistle-blower? What is, according to Caputo, the nature of a moral dilemma? What, according to Bauman, is the problem with following conventions or rules when deliberating over whistle-blowing?
2. How does the thought of Hans Jonas differ from that of Caputo and Bauman? How would his thought be applied to the question of whistle-blowing?
3. How does human freedom or autonomy come into question in the thought of all of these thinkers?
Answer in 2 to 3 paragraphs.