In this study we would reject the null hypothesis that the


This is the assignment along with my answers for the last 4 lab phases The final DB forum is the final phase of the 355 lab project, which gives you a chance to reflect on the lab results you obtained and share your thoughts with the class. You have collected the data, run the tests, and presented the results-now you can sit back and think about what it means. Was there any sort of relationship between church attendance and sound doctrinal belief based on your data set? Do these results match your initial prediction from Discussion Board Forum 1, or are they different? How generalizable do you think your results are? Do the results reflect the statements made by Quarles (2011) in the excerpt you read earlier (of little relationship between the variables), or do they demonstrate something different? Write about at least 1 implication these results could have for pastors, Sunday school teachers, and other church leaders. My answers from lab phase 4 so you have the numbers I have to work with for this assignment A Pearson correlation coefficient was completed to examine the possible relationship between church attendance (M= 22.18 SD= 30.958), and total understanding of basic Christian doctrine knowledge (M= 35.85 SD= 6.226). The study results show a significant positive linear correlation between the variables r (31) = .434 p= .012. In this study we would reject the null hypothesis that the correlation between the variables is zero and not significant. In this study as church attendance was increased the doctrinal knowledge also increased.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Basic Statistics: In this study we would reject the null hypothesis that the
Reference No:- TGS02702476

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)