How do fitzpatrick sanders amp worthen 2011 kirkpatrick

Topic: Evaluation

Details:

1) After reading and contrasting the three readings, please address both of the questions:

1. how do Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen (2011), Kirkpatrick (1998) and Newby (1992) each define "evaluation"?

2. what are the differences and similarities in the meanings, contexts and scopes of their definitions?

3. It's all about terminology. Why are these terms important in evaluation? And what distinguishes them from each other?
   a) Needs Assessment
   b) Monitoring
   c) Outcome Studies
   d) Testing
   e) Measurement
   f) Assessment

Resources:

1. Evaluation's Basic purpose, uses, and conceptual distinctions (pdf)

2. Evaluating training programs - The four levels Chapter 3:

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=4rYs1wnyUHUC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

3. Newby, T.(1992). Training Evaluation handbook (PP.3-27). San diego, CA:Pfeiffer.

No plagiarism.

No# of Pages: 2 pages (500 words)

Academic Level: Master

Subject Area: Education

No# of Sources Required: 3

Attachment:- Evaluations Basic purpose.rar

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Dissertation: How do fitzpatrick sanders amp worthen 2011 kirkpatrick
Reference No:- TGS01259746
Request for Solution File

Expected delivery within 24 Hours