How do fitzpatrick sanders amp worthen 2011 kirkpatrick

Topic: Evaluation


1) After reading and contrasting the three readings, please address both of the questions:

1. how do Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen (2011), Kirkpatrick (1998) and Newby (1992) each define "evaluation"?

2. what are the differences and similarities in the meanings, contexts and scopes of their definitions?

3. It's all about terminology. Why are these terms important in evaluation? And what distinguishes them from each other?
   a) Needs Assessment
   b) Monitoring
   c) Outcome Studies
   d) Testing
   e) Measurement
   f) Assessment


1. Evaluation's Basic purpose, uses, and conceptual distinctions (pdf)

2. Evaluating training programs - The four levels Chapter 3:

3. Newby, T.(1992). Training Evaluation handbook (PP.3-27). San diego, CA:Pfeiffer.

No plagiarism.

No# of Pages: 2 pages (500 words)

Academic Level: Master

Subject Area: Education

No# of Sources Required: 3

Attachment:- Evaluations Basic purpose.rar

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Dissertation: How do fitzpatrick sanders amp worthen 2011 kirkpatrick
Reference No:- TGS01259746

Expected delivery within 24 Hoursrs

2015 ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved. TutorsGlobe Rated 4.8/5 based on 34139 reviews.