1. On the discussion forum, describe an instance where a government has taken some action the result of which is influence on commerce. Minimum 250 words.
Response should be in diff doc
Respond to two classmates' postings. Minimum 100 words per posting.
1stclassmste original post need response for this....100words
The Commerce Among the States Clause operates each as a strength delegated to Congress and as a constraint upon nation regulation. No clause in the 1787 Constitution has been extra disputed, and it has generated greater instances than another. To nowadays, the talk over the volume of the trade strength centers at the definitions of "to adjust," "Commerce," and "among the several States."
The narrowest definition of "to alter" is to "make ordinary," this is, to facilitate the loose float of goods, but no longer, besides in instances of hazard, to restrict the glide of any top.
The Supreme Court has in no way established this slim definition. From the start, Chief Justice John Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) noticed the power to regulate as coextensive with the opposite delegated powers of Congress.
He declared: "This strength, like any others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost volume, and acknowledges no obstacles, other than are prescribed in the constitution." The way Congress comes to a decision to modify trade, Marshall stated, is completely on the discretion of Congress, problem handiest to the political take a look at of the voters. This power, as it later became out, includes the power to restrict the transportation of articles, as well as to manipulate their trade and transportation
Some commentators have defined "most of the numerous States" because of the trading and motion of goods between two or greater states.
But Chief Justice Marshall (again in Gibbons) thought among had a much wider purview than would the word between: "Comprehensive because the phrase ‘amongst' is, it may very nicely be limited to that commerce which worries more States than one." Although this turned into a broader concept, Marshall nonetheless saw that there may be a few trades that Congress can't attain: "The enumeration presupposes something now not enumerated; and that something, if we regard the language or the situation of the sentence, must be the exclusively inner trade of a State." Purely nearby sports, therefore, stay outdoor of the attain of Congress beneath the Commerce Among the States Clause.
2ndclassmste original post need response for this....100words
I work for a company called Sleepscore labs. We have a device that's manufactured in China. In 2018, USA under Donald Trump administration added 25% tax increase on Chinese imports which decreased our margins and impacted several other products.
In 2009, after depression, in United States under Barack Obama administration, added additional tax and made changes to immigration laws impacted several companies. It made it difficult to hire immigrants leaving thousands of immigrants jobless and projects being delayed.
In 2018, Trump administration in USA made another law enforcing restrictions on hiring immigrants. This decision impacted many companies and project deadlines. They also imposed salary structure for level of employees which means companies had to pay different salary which could be higher or lower.
In 2016, In India, Under Narendra Modi government, cancelled 500 and 1000 rupee currency bills which effected many businesses and millions of people. Businesses couldn't clear accounts. Bank and ATM were not ready for such drastic change.
In 2018, in India, government banned production of 2 stroke vehicles. If you have an existing vehicle, its fine but no more new vehicles were available. This law impacted several companies.
The societal and monetary perils of monopolies are clear. To battle the impacts of these extensive organizations, the government has attempted, through both legislation and court cases, to control monopolistic organizations. In spite of the fact that the procedures that the US has taken after have shifted, the point of curbing market authority has been generally consistent. In spite of the fact that cases of endeavors at government direction are boundless, three emerge from the rest: railways of the nineteenth Century, Microsoft, and IBM.