Analyze the arguments over whether the two parties bargained


Assignment

Read Case Study: "The Influenza Work Rule" and address the prompts below.

a. Analyze the arguments over whether the two parties bargained. Did management bargain in good faith with the union over the policy? Did they bargain to impasse? If so, does that give management the right to unilaterally implement its last offer?

b. Was management required to develop this new policy by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)? Did that trump labor-management considerations? Explain your reasoning.

c. Using a database (e.g., Bloomberg's BNA's Labor & Employment Law Resource Center), look at the Raffles v. Wichelhaus case (also known as the Peerless case) and the First National Maintenance Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) case. Evaluate management's argument that the flu-prevention policy is a core business decision in light of those case decisions.

d. Was management required to take this case to grievance arbitration? Explain your reasoning, considering the other precedent cases cited the managerial rights clause and the and zipper clause.

Format your assignment according to the give formatting requirements:

a. The answer must be double spaced, typed, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

b. The response also includes a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the course title, the student's name, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

c. Also include a reference page. The references and Citations should follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
HR Management: Analyze the arguments over whether the two parties bargained
Reference No:- TGS03142693

Now Priced at $30 (50% Discount)

Recommended (91%)

Rated (4.3/5)