--%>

Would inflation targeting be a good policy

Question:

Why might it be difficult for the Fed to formally adopt inflation targeting?  Would inflation targeting be a good policy for the Fed in the present economic environment?

Answer:

The most important part of the inflation targeting debate is about the optimal level of inflation. While many people believe that it should be in the range of 2%, it is difficult to ascertain the actual optimal level. Again, if the rate is fixed to 2%, then the Fed will have limited scope for a cut back in the interest rates, which might be required periodically to boost investment. Another case in point is that empirical evidence has suggested that US has experienced lowest level of unemployment when the inflation rate was in the range of 3-5%. Another problem is that the inflation targeting itself might not be efficient, asset price and hence the asset market control will also become important if the goals of inflation targeting are to be realized. In the present economic scenario, when the economy needs stimulus, and investment levels are quite low with high level of unemployment, inflation targeting does not seem to be a good policy measure. There is a need for an increase in the aggregate demand, which if materializes, will lead to an increase in inflation. And if inflation targeting is in place, the interest rates will have to be hiked, which will hamper recovery.

 

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of equal marginal advantage

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Shoppers who shift among checkout lanes until it emerges that all register lines are probable to be equally time-consuming are trying to verify to the law of: (i) Equivalent mar

  • Q : Macroeconomic perspective for Economic

    A family’s newly constructed home can produce the service of shelter across several years, therefore from a macroeconomic perspective, this is most reasonably classified as: (i) economic capital. (ii) social infrastructure. (iii) market capitalization. (iv) a fi

  • Q : Adaptive expectations & Rational

    Question: Compare and contrast 'adaptive expectations' (Hubbard uses adaptive expectations)  and 'rational expectations' in modeling expectations. Answer:<

  • Q : Objective of government Budget Give

    Give some objective of government Budget. Answer: The objectives which are pursued by government via the budget are as follows: A) To attain economic growth. B) To decrease in equalities in income and wealth.

  • Q : Paradox of Value-High values of

    The fact that most of the necessities for life like water are priced much lower than the frivolities like diamonds is addressed by the: (1) Utilitarian enigma. (2) Law of diminishing marginal utility. (3) Rational ignorance of hypothesis. (4) Paradox of the value. (5)

  • Q : From the heterodox approach From the

    From the heterodox approach, what options does the enterprise have to produce more output? What impact do these options have on its cost structure?

  • Q : Business fixed investment-Inventory

    Describe the following terms: (i) Business fixed investment (ii) Inventory Investment (iii) Residential construction Investment (iv) Public Investment.

  • Q : Self consumption-Value of output

    Illustrate whether output generated for self consumption is comprised or not comprised in the value of output? Answer: The output generated for self consumption is

  • Q : Purchasing and consumption of

    The usual household maximizes the utility by spending all its money to purchase and consume a combination of goods which yields: (1) Fundamental physiological requirements and customary wants. (2) Maximum status and the social prestige. (3) Complete satisfaction of al

  • Q : Paradox of Value problem I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Paradox of Value problem. Please help me in the following question. The Diamond Water Paradox occurs from the difficulties in differentiating between: (i) Consumer surplus and the total utility. (ii) Total utility and