Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent
Why is traditional, simple VaR measurement not coherent?
Expert
The traditional, simple VaR measure is not coherent because it does not satisfy the sub-additivity condition. Sub-additivity is an evident requirement for a risk measure; or else there would be no risk benefit to adding uncorrelated new trades in a book. When you have two portfolios X and Y so then this benefit can be explained as
ρ(X) + ρ(Y) − ρ(X + Y).
What are the Greeks?
Who explained the credit instruments explosion?
Define the steps of getting governing equation of Girsanov’s Theorem?
The risk-averse investor will pay off for risk when he will take on an investment project. Explain
Illustrates a case of a static arbitrage and model-independent arbitrage?
The United States contain experienced continuous present account deficits since the early 1980s. What do you think are the foremost reason for the deficits? What would be the consequences of continuous U.S. present account deficits?The present a
What are a callable bond and a putable bond? How can each of these bonds affect their market interest rates?
What are Finite-difference methods?
Illustrates the formula of Rho for the foreign exchange option value?
How is the risk into portfolio measured in Crash Metrics?
18,76,764
1928916 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1457222
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!