--%>

Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?

E

Expert

Verified

Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.

705_2.jpg

Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Operate market by economies of scale

    When a firm experiences economies of scale which span the bulk of demand in the market, in that case the market which this operates within will tend to: (i) evolve into a monopoly. (ii) become inefficient before this gets extremely large. (iii) seldom

  • Q : Calculating accounting profits The firm

    The firm has $70,000 in implicit costs, and the economic profit of $40,000. This firm’s: (i) Explicit cost equivalent $30,000. (ii) Accounting profits equivalent $110,000. (iii) Normal gain equivalents $40,000. (iv) Explicit costs equivalent $110,000.

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization An

    An imperfectly competitive firm can maximize profit within the long run only at prices and also outputs where demand elasticity is: (w) greater than or equal to 1. (x) less than 1. (y) less than 0. (z) between 0 and 1.

    Q : Supply of Labor-Income and Substitution

    I have a problem in economics on Supply of Labor: Income and Substitution Effects. Please help me in the following question. When the income effect of higher wage rate is more influential than the substitution effect, then: (1) The supply curve of labor is positively

  • Q : Law of Supply Law of Supply : Supply

    Law of Supply: Supply means the goods provided for sale at a price throughout a particular period of time. This is the capacity and intention of the producers to gen

  • Q : Why indifference curve is convex Why

    Why the indifference curve is convex to origin?

  • Q : Question on supply-and-demand diagrams

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Market Price in intervention Let’s take

    Let’s take a perfectly competitive market in which the market demand curve is provided by Qd = 20 − 2Pd and the market supply curve is provided by Qs = 2Ps. a) Determine the e

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand computations

    When yearly per capita income increases from $13,500 to $26,500 and custom car sales increase from 100,000 to 200,000, by using the arc elasticity formula, then the income elasticity of demand is: (i) 0.50. (ii) 0.75. (iii) 1.00. (iv)

  • Q : Imperfectly competitive market A firm

    A firm within an imperfectly competitive market is: (w) more likely to advertise than a purely competitive firm. (x) less probable to advertise than a purely competitive firm. (y) neither more nor less probable to advertise than a pure competitor. (z)