Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?




Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.


Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Precise Equality of Income Distribution

    Precise equality of income distribution is demonstrated by: (1) line 0A0'. (2) line 0B0'. (3) line 0C0'. (4) line 0D0'. (5) line 0E0'.

    Q : Falling probably interest rate The

    The interest rate will probably fall when households decide to: (w) consume more currently, shrinking the loanable funds obtainable for business investments. (x) buy new homes in place of restoring their old ones. (y) increase the liquidity of their a

  • Q : Average revenue and marginal revenue

    In spite of of the amount sold, price equals for a price-taker firm on both average: (i) revenue and marginal revenue. (ii) variable cost and marginal cost. (iii) fixed cost and average variable cost. (iv) total cost and marginal revenue.

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand when price

    When diet faddists gulp 205 million unsweetened as “No-Carb” milkshakes of $2.30 apiece, if cut back to 155 million per week while the price rises to $3.70 every, the price elasticity of their demand for shakes equivalents

  • Q : Best illustration of an oligopoly The

    The best illustration of an oligopoly is: (1) guaranteed next-day delivery of packages and mail. (2) cranberry production. (3) all the local electric utility companies in New England. (4) the United Autoworkers [UAW] union. (5) Wal-Mart.

  • Q : Predictable results of unexpected

    Predictable results of unexpected development of demand for a competitively produced good comprise increases and in that case gradual decreases in the: (w) price of the good and the profits of producers. (x) consumer surplus derived from the good. (y)

  • Q : Problem on Yellow Dog Contracts Now the

    Now the illegal labor market practice of signing the yellow dog contracts includes requiring: (1) Nonunion workers to pay the union dues as the condition of employment. (2) Job applicants to sign the agreements not to join unions previous to hiring them. (3) Unions to

  • Q : Break even income by marginal tax rate

    A marginal tax rate of 30 percent and income floor of $6,000 yields a break even income of: (w) $20,000 (x) $1,800 (y) $4,200 (z) $7,800

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of

  • Q : Under negative income tax the net income

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, where a family of four all along with earned income of $60,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (1) $37,500 per year. (2) $42,500 per year. (3) $50,000 per year. (4) $55,0

  • Q : When market for a good is in equilibrium

    Whenever the market for the good is in equilibrium, this signifies that the: (i) Demand and supply are equivalent. (ii) Tax wedge is perfectly offset by the government advantages. (iii) Differences among demand prices and supply prices equivalent profit per unit. (iv)

2015 ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved. TutorsGlobe Rated 4.8/5 based on 34139 reviews.