--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?

E

Expert

Verified

Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.

705_2.jpg

Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Trade Restrictions of import and export

    Quotas that restricted U.S. imports of foreign steel between 2001 and 2004 because of the: (w) prices paid by U.S. car buyers to rise. (x) price of gasoline to rise sharply. (y) profits of U.S. steelmakers to drop. (z) quantities of European imports t

    		•
  • Q : Problem on demand-Purchasing goods I

    I have a problem in economics on demand-Purchasing goods. Please help me in the following question. The quantity of good consumers will purchase beneath different conditions are termed as consumer: (i) Requirements. (ii) Entitlements. (iii) Wants. (iv

    		•
  • Q : Stickiness of prices in oligopolistic

    The "kinked-demand-curve" model was developed into the 1930 year in part to help describe: (i) barriers to entry in oligopoly markets. (ii) the allegedly excessive stickiness of prices into oligopolistic industries. (iii) how competitive industries be

    		•
  • Q : Determine short-run supply of an

    The Christmas tree industry’s short-run supply is demonstrated as: (1) curve A. (2) curve B. (3) curve E. (4) curve F. (5) curve G.

    Q : Price taking and price making The price

    The price makers within a purely competitive market are: (i) auctioneers (ii) buyers. (iii) sellers. (iv) both buyers and sellers. (v) nobody. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problem

    		•
  • Q : Annual economic profit of production

    When point e corresponds to $18 per copy for St. Valentine’s Day software, so Prohibition Corporation can produce annual economic profit of at most just about: (i) $100 million. (ii) $140 million. (iii) $200 million. (iv) $300 million. (v) $400

    		•
  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Rational Ignorance Not

    Not learning the whole thing possible regarding someone prior to you marry them is an illustration of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Moral hazard. (iii) Economic dishonesty. (iv) Blind indifference. (v) Rational ignorance. Choose the

    		•
  • Q : Total variable costs of

    Total variable costs of this profit-maximizing lumber mill are approximately: (i) $2000 per day. (ii) $2400 per day. (iii) $2800 per day. (iv) $3200 per day. (v) $3600 per day.

    Q : Corporations stockholders not liable

    The corporation’s stockholders are not personally liable for the debts of firm since: (1) The Corporation is considered as a legal person, separate from its owner. (2) Usually there are too many stockholders to try to hold them all accountable. (3) In a corporat

    		•