--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Short-run Demand for Labor Short-run

    Short-run demand for the labor would be LEAST affected by the: (i) Productivity of resource. (ii) Prices of substitute resources. (iii) Demand for goods generated by the resource. (iv) Fixed costs of firm. Can someone please help m

  • Q : Another name of micro economics What is

    What is another name of micro economics? Answer: Price theory

  • Q : Implicit Costs-Earning income The

    The economic cost borne by you as the college student which would be ignored by the bookkeeper whenever computing costs however that economists would consider the implicit cost of your education would be: (1) Food, similar costs and rent which you would incur even whe

  • Q : Law of demand is the price in the "law

    is the price in the "law of demand" a relative price or an absolute price

  • Q : Excess of good in market problem The

    The excess of papayas would appear when: (1) seller’s supply prices increase to P1. (2) Govt. set a price ceiling of P1. (3) Growers predicted prices to soar. (4) Hurricane destroyed all Central American papaya plantations. (5) Government obliged a price floor o

  • Q : Implicit Costs definition The Implicit

    The Implicit costs are: (i) The opportunity costs of resources contributed by the firm’s owner. (ii) Costs that need a cash outlay. (iii) Usually comprised in the computation of accounting profit. (iv) Fictional costs which do not influence the

  • Q : Monetary price and Transaction Costs

    You are more probable to shop at a remote farmer’s market at a lower monetary price instead of purchasing apples at a higher monetary price at the local grocery store if: (i) Possible, as production is cheaper at the farmer’s market. (ii) You want to purch

  • Q : Purchasing power of a consumers income

    The modification in purchases which results since changes in relative prices modify the purchasing power of a consumer's income is termed as: (i) Adjustment margin. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Demonstration effect. (iv) Transfer pattern. (v) Replacement

  • Q : Illustration of zero Consumer Surpluses

    Clark pays $99.95 for the latest fishing rod. When Clark was willing to pay just a maximum of $99.95 for that fishing rod, his consumer surplus equivalents: (1) zero. (2) Clark would not be willing to buy the fishing rod at $99.95. (3) $99.95. (4) Clark would be bette

  • Q : Marginal costs for producing and selling

    Monsieur Cournot has a monopoly on an artesian well from that flows tasty spring water along with medicinal properties. To ignore variable costs, he insists which customers bring their own pails as well as fill them individually. Cour