--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Demand for Labor

    Subsequent to adjusting for inflation, Alex Rodriquez salary with NY Yankees was much higher in the year 2006 than Henry Aaron's salary with the Atlanta Braves in the year 1970s that implies that: (i) The 2006 Yankees was more liberal than the year 1970s Braves. (ii)

  • Q : Amount of goods or resource under

    The amounts of a good or resource which sellers will offer beneath different conditions are termed as its: 1) Supply. (2) Availability. (3) Market. (4) Equilibrium. (5) Surplus. Find out the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : Objectives of Microeconomic policy

    Widely accepted objectives for microeconomic policy comprise: (w) full employment. (x) general price stability. (y) economic development. (z) efficiency, freedom and equity. Hey friends please give your opinion for

  • Q : Question based on production

    In drawing the production possibilities curve we assume that: 1) technology is fixed. 2) unemployment exists. 3) economic resources are unlimited. 4) wants are limited.

  • Q : Relationship between Total utility and

    Describe the relationship between Total utility (TU) and Marginal utility (MU)? Answer:

    Q : Personal distribution of income Select

    Select the right ans wer of the question. The personal distribution of income refers to the: A) division of income between personal taxes, consumption expenditures, and saving. B) division of income on the basis of industry sources, for example, agriculture, transport

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns for a good

    The point is inevitably reached where an individual derives less extra enjoyment from the extra units of any good. This is mainly well-suited with: (i) Supply curves that slope-up and to right. (ii) Concave (or bowed out) production possibilities frontiers. (iii) The

  • Q : Monopsony power without wage

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Minimum wage laws are most probable to increase the equilibrium employment when a firm has been exercising: (1) Monopoly power and price discrimination. (2) Employee choice in markets for

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand for pizza

    Since the price drops/falls from $8 to 1 all along this demand curve, the price elasticity of demand for pizza: (1) increases towards infinity. (2) Drops/Falls towards zero. (3) Increases, then drop/falls. (4) Always equivalents 1 and demand is unitar

  • Q : Capital Goods In the above diagram, the

    In the above diagram, the elimination of discrimination is best represented by