--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Lowest possible price in transaction Costs

Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?

E

Expert

Verified

No and yes, correspondingly. (Students will suggest the following sorts of illustrations that are refuted here.)

Illustration: After a search I purchased a Toro lawnmower of $450. The after that day similar mower was on sale for $375. So, did I pay too much?  At the instance you made the purchase the response was no. You had determined that prospective monetary savings from additional search would have exceeded the expected transaction costs acquired; this was cheapest at $450. Illustration: I can make popcorn at much lower monetary cost than its price into a theater. Refutation The cost of popcorn should be lower in the theater for those who buy this than would be the cost of going home to make this, and into the process, missing the movie.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Commercial introduction of production

    Innovation: (w) entails financial investment to create human capital. (x) comprises the commercial introduction of a new product or production process. (y) can reasonably describe only normal accounting profit. (z) was used by John Maynard Keynes to d

    		•
  • Q : Example of a vertical merger An example

    An example of the vertical merger would be: (i) Merging the Oscar Myer hot dog Company with Wrangler Jeans Company and Aquafina Water Company. (ii) The log cabin architecture firm merging with the logging company and construction company. (iii) Merger between Wachovia

    		•
  • Q : Problem of dockworkers on hiking the pay

    When you were in the ski boat business, your net revenues from selling given numbers of boats would be least influenced by: (i) Govt. increasing fees for boat licenses. (ii) Rises in prices for jet skis. (iii) Pay hikes for dock-workers. (iv) Vacation

    		•
  • Q : When are average and outputs prices of

    Average and Outputs prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (before the start of Napster and subsequent file-sharing software), which implying: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand doesn’t apply

    		•
  • Q : Law of comparative benefits Can someone

    Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The law of comparative benefit exhibits: (a) Why trade with a country in which salaries are low is not fair. (b) How countries try to use each other via trade. (c)

    		•
  • Q : Maximum possible total revenue by sales

    Maximum possible total revenue by sales of the especially popular St. Valentine’s Day software is about: (i) $140 million. (ii) $250 million. (iii) $350 million. (iv) $420 million. (v) $1 billion.

    Q : Downward-sloping demand curve The law

    The law of demand is graphically demonstrated by: (1) Movement all along the supply curve. (2) The downward-sloping demand curve. (3) The rightward shift of demand curve. (4) Shifting of production possibilities. C

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

    		•
  • Q : Problem on deadweight loss Assume that

    Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By

    		•
  • Q : Problem on competitive equilibrium of

    The economy consists of two consumers, A and B. Both consumers are endowed with one unit of good 1 and one unit of good 2. Consumer A is entirely indifferent between all consumption plans. Consumer B has the utility function u(xB1 ; xB

    		•