Lowest possible price in transaction Costs
Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?
Expert
No and yes, correspondingly. (Students will suggest the following sorts of illustrations that are refuted here.)
Illustration: After a search I purchased a Toro lawnmower of $450. The after that day similar mower was on sale for $375. So, did I pay too much? At the instance you made the purchase the response was no. You had determined that prospective monetary savings from additional search would have exceeded the expected transaction costs acquired; this was cheapest at $450. Illustration: I can make popcorn at much lower monetary cost than its price into a theater. Refutation The cost of popcorn should be lower in the theater for those who buy this than would be the cost of going home to make this, and into the process, missing the movie.
I have a problem in economics on Problem of tax on a good. Please help me in the following question. The tax on a good tends to form: (1) A wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers collect. (2) Rises in supply from the perspectives of buyers. (3) More
Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, that profit-maximizing monopolist will charge a price of: (1) $10 per dozen roses. (2) $12 pe
Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. In short run, the market demands are: (1) Stimulated if resource costs increase. (2) Simply estimated employing aggregate data. (3) Positively associated to the
settlement range between management and the trade union
Within the short run, a price-maker firm along with important market power but that cannot price discriminate is unable to concurrently maximize profit and: (i) charge a price equal to marginal cost. (ii) minimize average total cost. (iii) produce out
I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium for a price maker firm. Please help me in the following question. In equilibrium, for a price maker firm, the charge of monopolistic exploitation is any difference among: (1) P and MR. (2) P and MC. (3) VMP
This purely competitive peach orchard would most likely exit this industry within the long run when the wholesale price per bushel of peaches fell below: (i) $9.00 per bushel of peaches. (ii) $10.00 per bushel of peaches. (iii) $11.00 per bushel of pe
Types of measurement in Metrics: A) Nominal: a nominal scale assigns items to a category. For example, the category may be a simple "yes" or "no." In the case of a family, a nominal scale
Pure competitors generate where P = MC since this: (w) is the best price and output for society. (x) maximizes combined consumer and producer surpluses. (y) is consistent along with maximizing profit at a specified price. (z) conforms to government re
In the market period: (w) price is constant. (x) output is constant. (y) supply is horizontal. (z) supply is completely elastic. Please guys help to solve this problem of Economics with some explan
18,76,764
1928629 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1451422
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!