--%>

Individual firm in purely competitive industry

In a purely competitive industry, the individual firm: (i) can raise the quantity demanded by lowering the price of its product. (ii) experiences substantial economies of scale. (iii) faces a completely inelastic demand curve. (iv) cannot influence the market price. (v) None of the above.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Prices and costs of investment goods

    The prices and costs of investment goods do not be likely to: (1) rise during periods of prosperity. (2) rise as demand for these goods increases. (3) fall throughout economic slumps. (4) fall as demand for these goods decreases. (5) fall as a result

  • Q : Shift in demand in the price of auto

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The price per mile of mass transit has increases much rapid since the year 1980 than the price of private auto travel. This has contributed to the shift in demand

  • Q : Price hike in short run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Price hike in short run. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the demand curve for the potatoes will not be influenced by price hikes for: (i) Potatoes. (ii) Bread. (iii) Rice. (iv) Steak.

    Q : Firms demand for labor Assume that the

    Assume that the international auto industry has become monopolistically competitive and you run a small automaker. The events which would not directly influence your firm’s demand for labor comprise: (i) Sales of your company’s most admired car unexpectedl

  • Q : Find absolute value of the price

    Two thousand four hundred students subscribed to cable TV services while they enrolled like freshmen. 800 of them students dropped the service while the price of cable rose by $25 to $35 per month. The absolute value of the price elasticity of demand

  • Q : Monopolistic exploitation of workers

    When a firm hires workers to a point where VMP > MRP = MFC = W then: (1) There is a bilateral monopoly condition. (2) Wage discrimination is being exercised. (3) There is monopolistic exploitation of the workers. (4) The firm consists of monopsony power.

  • Q : Problem regarding to tax wedges in

    In equilibrium, a tax upon a good tends to because of the: (1) supply to exceed the demand. (2) quantity supplied to exceed the quantity demanded. (3) demand prices of consumers to exceed the supply prices of sellers. (4) competitive

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand An

    An approximate estimate of the price elasticity of demand is best computed by the absolute value of the formula: (1) change in P / change within Q. (2) % change in Q / % change in P. (3) % change in Q / % change in income. (4) % chang

  • Q : Featherbedding in the practice of hiring

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (m) Blacklisting in its dealings t

  • Q : Long run equilibrium for a purely

    In long-run equilibrium for a purely competitive firm: (w) MC = P = MR = min.(LRAC). (x) MC = TR = PQ = AVC. (y) LRAC = PQ = TVC + TFC = MR. (z) P = Q = wL + rK = Y. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo