--%>

Independent queue vs. pooled queue

Instruction:

McDonald's vs. Burger King - these two fast food chains use different waiting line design: Independent queue vs. pooled queue. To compare the two different queue systems on equal footing, let's assume that we pick a McDonald's store as an experiment site. Assume that the customer inter-arrival time has a mean value a= 2 min. which is also equal to its std.dev. (so CVa=1). It has 2 registers operated by 2 cashers and supported by a team of kitchen staff. The order processing time (from talking to the casher until receiving the food) is on average 3 minutes with a CVp=1. In the first experiment, suppose we set up the rails in advance (as in a BK store) and ask all customers who walked into the door to form a single queue. Then the first customer in the queue can go to any vacant register to order food. In the second experiment, suppose the customer arrival to the store stays the same as the above. However, we take away the rails in advance and ask customers to choose either register A or B upon their entry to the restaurant front door. Thus, there are two independent waiting lines. Suppose that all customers agree that line-hopping is not allowed after a customer chooses the register to join the waiting line. You can also assume that the CVa=1 in the second system. Please compare the mean waiting times (Tq) between two systems.

Answer:

1st case:

a = 2 min, CVa = 1, p = 3, CVp = 1, m = 2

u = (1/a)/(m/p) = (1/2)(2/3) = 0.75

Waiting time = (p/m)(u^[{2(m+1)}1/2 - 1]/1-u)[CVa2 + CVp2/2]

= (1.5) (0.75^ {(6)1/2 - 1}/0.25) (1 + 1/2)

= (1.5)(0.66)/0.25 = 3.96 minutes

2nd case:

a = 4 min, CVa = 1, p = 3, CVp = 1, m = 2

u = (1/a)/(m/p) = (1/4)(2/3) = 0.375

Waiting time = (p/m)(u^[{2(m+1)}1/2 - 1]/1-u)[CVa2 + CVp2/2]

= (1.5) (0.375^ {(6)1/2 - 1}/0.625) (1 + 1/2)

= (1.5)(0.24)/0.625 = 0.576 minutes

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Introduction of the term Risk factor

    Give a brief introduction of the term Risk factor?

  • Q : Why is speculation unlike arbitrage

    Speculation is unlike arbitrage since: (1) speculative buyers always break even. (2) speculation causes increased costs. (3) speculators bear no risk. (4) positive returns for speculators are not sure. (5) competitive speculation equa

  • Q : Explain about the successful speculation

    Successful speculation tends to: (1) generate inflationary pressure. (2) assist stabilize relative prices. (3) reduce the incomes of the eventual producers of goods. (4) make relative prices more volatile. (5) increase the risk born through the eventu

  • Q : Symptoms of governmental interference-

    Adam Smith and the “typical liberal” economists who followed within his footsteps viewed persistent monopolization and market power as: (1) ineffective and best regulated through government. (2) crucial in finding the rate of technological

  • Q : Market efficiency while transaction

    Transaction costs tend to be decreased and markets are more efficient when: (w) the government subsidizes a good. (x) inter-market price differentials are eliminated through arbitrage. (y) taxes are used to give for social wants. (z) regulations close

  • Q : Explain the term Operating Leverage

    Briefly explain the term Operating Leverage?

  • Q : Define the for whom query in market

    The market system responses the “for whom?” query with: (i) distributing goods on the basis of require. (ii) using central planning to coordinate production decisions. (iii) catering to consumers with adequate resources to demand goods. (i

  • Q : Comment surpluses drives price

    surpluses drives price down,shortages drive up

  • Q : Illustrations of opportunity costs

    Illustrations of opportunity costs which you might or will have incurred would comprise: (i) severe injuries suffered within an accident since you failed to buckle up. (ii) the income you could earn when you were not in school. (iii) time spent studyi

  • Q : Surpluses in the balance of trade The

    The advocates of laissez-faire policies favor: (i) Govt. control of economy. (ii) Public ownership of all the resources. (iii) Income to be distributed according to requirement. (iv) Surpluses in the balance of trade. (v) Minimal govt. intervention in economy.