--%>

Independent queue vs. pooled queue

Instruction:

McDonald's vs. Burger King - these two fast food chains use different waiting line design: Independent queue vs. pooled queue. To compare the two different queue systems on equal footing, let's assume that we pick a McDonald's store as an experiment site. Assume that the customer inter-arrival time has a mean value a= 2 min. which is also equal to its std.dev. (so CVa=1). It has 2 registers operated by 2 cashers and supported by a team of kitchen staff. The order processing time (from talking to the casher until receiving the food) is on average 3 minutes with a CVp=1. In the first experiment, suppose we set up the rails in advance (as in a BK store) and ask all customers who walked into the door to form a single queue. Then the first customer in the queue can go to any vacant register to order food. In the second experiment, suppose the customer arrival to the store stays the same as the above. However, we take away the rails in advance and ask customers to choose either register A or B upon their entry to the restaurant front door. Thus, there are two independent waiting lines. Suppose that all customers agree that line-hopping is not allowed after a customer chooses the register to join the waiting line. You can also assume that the CVa=1 in the second system. Please compare the mean waiting times (Tq) between two systems.

Answer:

1st case:

a = 2 min, CVa = 1, p = 3, CVp = 1, m = 2

u = (1/a)/(m/p) = (1/2)(2/3) = 0.75

Waiting time = (p/m)(u^[{2(m+1)}1/2 - 1]/1-u)[CVa2 + CVp2/2]

= (1.5) (0.75^ {(6)1/2 - 1}/0.25) (1 + 1/2)

= (1.5)(0.66)/0.25 = 3.96 minutes

2nd case:

a = 4 min, CVa = 1, p = 3, CVp = 1, m = 2

u = (1/a)/(m/p) = (1/4)(2/3) = 0.375

Waiting time = (p/m)(u^[{2(m+1)}1/2 - 1]/1-u)[CVa2 + CVp2/2]

= (1.5) (0.375^ {(6)1/2 - 1}/0.625) (1 + 1/2)

= (1.5)(0.24)/0.625 = 0.576 minutes

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Guardian implies that there really is

    Evaluate and explain the statements: “Market is its own guardian implies that there really is an invisible hand or taskmaster that watches over the decision makers in the marketplace”

  • Q : Our junior high school serves a

    Comment on the following statement from a newspaper article:  “Our junior high school serves a splendid hot meal for $1 without costing the taxpayers anything, thanks in part to a government subsidy.”

  • Q : Local expenditures and receipts for all

    Elucidate the Local expenditures and receipts for all local governmental units in 1996?

  • Q : Organization identify the reasons for

    identify the reasons for the formation of organizations

  • Q : Perfectly competitive market and its

    Which of the given is not a characteristic of a perfectly competitive market structure: w) there are a very huge number of firms which are small compared to the market. x) All firms sell the same products. y) There are no restrictions to entry through

  • Q : Illustrate the Optimal or best

    Illustrate the Optimal or best product-mix and also Law of increasing opportunity costs?

  • Q : Laissez-faire philosophy of government

    As per to the laissez-faire philosophy of government,: (1) economy works best while all investment decisions are centralized. (2) market system works best along with only minimal government intervention. (3) government must be restricted to stabilizin

  • Q : Explain about the principle of

    Economic efficiency needs that, relative to the other goods which different individuals might consume, the people who value exact goods relatively the most should own and/or use all goods. Such principle is termed as: (i) economic equity. (ii) allocat

  • Q : Impact of dollar on aspects of

    Question Discuss the impact of dollar depreciation on the various aspects of American Economy. Devaluation of the DollarIntroduction:

  • Q : Technological advances in producing

    When given resources can now produce additional goods than was previously probable, then there have been a: (1) Stock market boom. (2) Competitive spurt which shrinks entrepreneurial gain. (3) Concavity reversal in the production possibilities frontier. (4) Bigger rel