--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Economic Capital and Per Capita Income

Assume that half of our world’s people, arbitrarily selected, were vaporized by space aliens or teleported to the parallel universe, however no other feature of life on our Earth was influenced. Avoiding any disruptions to families or psychological trauma this calamity might cause, the average economic well being of the survivors would: (1) Rise since of enhanced efficiencies related with the divisions of labor in production. (2) Reduction as of decreased specialization and exchange according to the comparative benefit. (3) Raise as of rises in the per capita accessibility of economic capital and land. (4) be unaffected as the total value of the world production would not be influenced in a expected direction. (5) Reduction as reductions in the total human capital on Earth.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

    		•
  • Q : Gains from trade and economic consensus

    While considering current events and matters, economists and the common public seem to disagree relatively the most about: (i) what to do regarding the War in Iraq. (ii) whether Democrats or Republicans must win the next election. (iii) the relative costs and advantag

    		•
  • Q : Technological change in extracting

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. A good illustration of technological change would be a discovery of a: (i) Pool of oil as big as any in Kuwait merely a bit south of Cleveland. (ii) Tenth planet as big as Neptune circling our

    		•
  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

    		•
  • Q : Problem of Slavery and Normative

    Please guys help me to solve the problem of Slavery and Normative Economics that is given below: Slavery like a mechanism for allocating labor previous to the Civil War eventually proved to be in conflict along wit

    		•
  • Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

    In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

    		•
  • Q : Closest to a Free Good in economic What

    What would be the closest to a "free good" in economic terms: (i) Local telephone directory assistance, (ii) Air conditioning thrown in when you buy a new car, (iii) Drinking water and (iv) Breathable air of the current atmospheric quality?

  • Q : Explained economics capital generally

    Where is generally economic capital referred: (1) Money and other financial assets. (2) Machinery, buildings and equipment. (3) Net investment minus depreciation. (4) Corporate bonds and stocks. Can anybody suggest

    		•
  • Q : Which principle is simplest workable

    The principle which the simplest workable theory is also the fine is termed as: (i) positive analytics. (ii) minimalism. (iii) Occam's razor. (iv) simple-mindedness. (v) hypothesis testing. I need a good answer on the topic of

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•