--%>

Diminishing Returns for different kinds of goods

The Standard economic suppositions recommend that the production possibilities frontiers are concave from beneath [from origin] mainly because: (i) People desire additional units of a good less the more of good they encompass. (ii) The relative productivity of various resources differs for various kinds of goods. (iii) Optimal decisions need equating marginal costs with marginal advantages. (iv) Production costs tend to drop as more and more of good is generated.

What is the right answer?

   Related Questions in Econometrics

  • Q : Division of labor advantages for workers

    The advantages from the division of labor are improved as workers: (1) Are protected by the barriers which limit the international trade. (2) Who each recognize all facets of production gain an enhanced understanding of the whole project. (3) Constant

  • Q : Allocative and distributive decisions

    In countries which rely greatly on centralized decision making most: (i) Main allocative decisions are made by the consumers and business organizations. (ii) Allocative and distributive decisions are made by government. (iii) Nonhuman resources are owned and controlle

  • Q : Expanding the Diminishing Returns Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing returns refers to the rising: (1) Complexities encountered in expanding any activity continually. (2) Reductions in the costs from expanding big scale p

  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms Allocative

    Allocative mechanisms like the market system, queuing, brute force, and random choice: (1) Depict the menu accessible to a society with infinite resources. (2) Illustrate relationships among inputs and outputs. (3) All tend to be less proficient than

  • Q : Suitability of resources for production

    The ‘law of rising costs’ as it applies to the production possibilities frontiers is best demonstrated by: (i) Various suitability of the resources for alternative kinds of production. (ii) Inverse relationships among the price and quantit

  • Q : Mixture of market and command elements

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The modern U.S. economy: (i) Is an illustration of a pure market system. (ii) Is a mix of market and command element. (iii) Has evolved to a fundamental command system s (iv) Experienced littl

  • Q : Circular Flow Model-People in households

    I have a problem in economics on Circular Flow Model-People in households. Please help me in the following question. In a simple circular flow model, the ‘owners’ of all the resources are classified as: (i) Employees. (ii) Entrepreneurs. (

  • Q : Increasing Costs-Production

    The Production possibilities frontiers (or PPFs) tend to be ‘bowed out’ since: (i) More of one good mandates the lower production of other. (ii) A few resources are inevitably underutilized or unemployed. (iii) Technology is supposed const

  • Q : Entailing the allocation of queuing The

    The allocation by queuing entails waste since some people: (i) Overstress their work credentials to acquire good jobs. (ii) May gain whereas others lose whenever lotteries are employed. (iii) Will spend long, fruitless periods waiting in line. (iv) Co

  • Q : Problem on distributing welfare needs

    According to the need criterion of distribution: (1) The market system most proficiently allots all goods. (2) Government must distribute output in accord with requirement. (3) Wages according to requirement, gain according to greed. (4) People must produce in proport