--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relatively market power The firm from

    The firm from the given list with relatively the most market power would probably be: (w) General Motors. (x) the world's biggest wheat farm. (y) a gas station in Wayout, Wyoming that has no competitors into 70 miles. (z) the BestBuy in Durham, North

    		•
  • Q : Income sufficient to physical survival

    The view about all people is entitled to income sufficient to comfortably sustain their physical survival is termed as the: (1) survival standard. (2) contribution standard. (3) needs standard. (4) standard deduction. (5) equality standard.

  • Q : Political pressure on government

    When the government imposes a price floor upon a product, in that case there may be political pressure for the government: (1) to produce several of the good itself. (2) to restrict the demands of private buyers. (3) to buy and then store some surplus

    		•
  • Q : Income distribution line in Lorenz curve

    When line 0C0' shows the 1975 U.S. income distribution, in that case the 2005 income distribution would most likely be most probable: (1) line 0A0'. (2) line 0B0'. (3) line 0C0'. (4) line 0D0'. (5) line 0E0'.

  • Q : Existence of purely competitive farm in

    This purely competitive rose farm would most likely exit in this industry with the long run when the wholesale price per dozen roses fell below: (i) $4.50 per dozen roses. (ii) $5.00 per dozen roses. (iii) $5.50 per dozen roses. (iv) $6.00 per dozen r

    		•
  • Q : Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying it less. (ii) Purchasing a new car subsequent to getting an increase. (iii) Distributing excess food to starving children. (iv) Who studies muc

    		•
  • Q : Types of market in economy Types of

    Types of market in economy: There are two kinds of market in this economy: Factor market-for Factors of Production and Product market-for goods and Services.

    		•
  • Q : Laws and Regulations-caveat emptor I

    I have a problem in economics on Laws and Regulations-caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. The Latin phrase which means ‘let the buyer beware is: (1) Caveat emptor. (2) Laissez-faire. (3) Fiat justitia and ruat coelum. (4) Epluribus unum. (5)

    		•
  • Q : Determine total revenue by zero

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. Often, lots of Texans are romantics at heart. When Hybrid Roses set the price of a dozen roses at the point where marginal revenue is zero, in that case its total revenue

    		•
  • Q : Problem on law of demand Let think

    Let think about the law of demand. The idea that a big price for a normal good will outcome in less of the good being bought never based logically on the: (i) Income effect. (ii) Demand for the good falling since of the higher price. (iii) Law of redu

    		•