--%>

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Wage Differentials-similar wages Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. As compared to men with identical amounts of experience or education, women on an average earn: (1) Higher wages. (2) Similar wages. (3) Lower wages. (4) There is no special pat

  • Q : Barriers to entry for new firms in

    Barriers to entry, that is:  (w) make this complicated or impossible for new firms to profitably enter an industry. (x) uniformly violate U.S. antitrust statutes. (y) are essentially technological instead of economic. (z) stimulate aggressive com

  • Q : Problem on losing financial investments

     Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. Owners generally can’t lose more than their financial investments when a firm is a: (i) Proprietorship. (ii) Family business. (iii) Partnership. (iv) Corporation.

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in the long run

    In the past 4 decades, the still increasing globalization of trade has caused the United State automobile market to evolve by: (i) highly concentrated oligopoly towards monopolistic competition. (ii) pure monopoly to pure competition. (iii) a cartel t

  • Q : Principle of equal marginal utilities

    The thought that, in equilibrium, the more you pay for the good, more it is worth (that is, at the margin) to you is most intimately associated to the: (1) Law of diminishing returns. (2) Equivalent satisfaction corollary. (3) Veblen effect. (4) Rising cost hypothesis

  • Q : Increase in Income Tax Progressivity

    When this figure demonstrated Lorenz curves for distribution of income after taxes and transfers, in that case it is UNTRUE of the Lorenz curves demonstrated in this demonstrated figure that: (1) line 0E0' represents a Lorenz curve of

  • Q : Competitive advertising as waste of

    Economists have conventionally concluded which, from the vantage point of society as an entire, competitive advertising in that case: (1) enables consumers to make more efficient economic choices. (2) is a waste of resources. (3) cons

  • Q : Production and costs in monopolistic

    In the short run, no profit-oriented monopolistically-competitive firm still knowingly generates any output unless: (1) an economic profit is assured. (2) total revenues are expected to equal or exceed its total variable costs. (3) the average wage ra

  • Q : Labor markets profit maximization When,

    When, after hiring the very last worker, the organization’s profit is similar as it was before the last worker was hired, then the firm must: (1) Hire more workers to raise the profit. (2) Layoff some workers to raise the profit. (3) Not appoint any more workers

  • Q : Surety of good market information for

    The assumption about buyers and sellers has good market information makes sure that they: (w) know everything. (x) never make errors. (y) can foretell the future. (z) won’t pay more than they have to, or sell for less than the market price.